首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Gerontologist >Prevalence of Nursing Assistant Training and Certification Programs Within Nursing Homes 1997–2007
【2h】

Prevalence of Nursing Assistant Training and Certification Programs Within Nursing Homes 1997–2007

机译:1997–2007年疗养院内护理助理培训和认证计划的普遍性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe how the prevalence of nurse aide training and competency evaluation programs (NATCEPs) provided in the nursing home (NH) setting changed between 1997 and 2007, to explore the environmental factors that may be influencing the prevalence of these programs, and to examine how the changing prevalence of NH-based NATCEPs may be affecting those considering certified nursing assistant (CNA) work. >Methods: We used the Online Survey Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) data to generate descriptive statistics for 3 groups of NHs from 1997 to 2007: NHs that never provided an NATCEP, those that provided the program throughout the study period, and those that provided the program intermittently. We gathered information on states’ policies regarding CNA training by telephone and Internet. Data from the National Nursing Assistant Survey were also utilized to describe where CNAs are receiving their training and what proportion of costs they are paying. >Results: Prevalence of NH-based programs dropped throughout the study period. It is likely that most CNAs are now receiving their preemployment training outside the NH setting and paying a greater share of their training costs. >Implications: The shifting of CNA training to venues other than NHs raises important questions about the quality of training and states’ ability to monitor training programs. In addition, CNAs receiving training outside NHs pay a greater share of their training costs, possibly creating a disincentive to enter the field.
机译:>目的:本研究的目的是描述1997年至2007年之间在养老院(NH)设置中提供的护士助手培训和能力评估计划(NATCEP)的发生率如何变化,以探索环境可能影响这些计划普及率的因素,并研究基于NH的NATCEP的普及率变化如何影响那些正在考虑获得认证的护理助理(CNA)工作的人。 >方法:我们使用在线调查认证和报告(OSCAR)数据生成了1997年至2007年之间3组NH的描述性统计数据:从未提供过NATCEP的NH,那些在整个研究期间都提供了该计划的NH期间,以及断断续续提供程序的人。我们通过电话和互联网收集了各州有关CNA培训政策的信息。国家护理助理调查的数据还用于描述CNA在哪里接受培训以及他们所支付费用的比例。 >结果:在整个研究期间,基于NH的程序的流行率有所下降。多数CNA可能现在正在NH以外的地方接受职前培训,并支付更多的培训费用。 >影响:将CNA培训转移到NHs以外的场所提出了有关培训质量和州监控培训计划的能力的重要问题。此外,在国家卫生机构以外接受培训的CNA承担了其培训费用中的较大份额,这可能会阻碍进入该领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号