首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine >Diagnostic value of multislice computerized tomography angiography for aortic dissection: A comparison with DSA
【2h】

Diagnostic value of multislice computerized tomography angiography for aortic dissection: A comparison with DSA

机译:多层计算机断层血管造影对主动脉夹层的诊断价值:与DSA的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to compare multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of aortic dissection. In total, 49 patients with aortic lesions received enhanced computed tomography scanning, and three-dimensional (3D) images were reconstructed by volume rendering (VR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reformation (MPR) and curved planar reconstruction (CPR). The display rate of the entry tear site, intimal flap, true and false lumen from each reconstruction method was calculated. For 30 patients with DeBakey type III aortic dissection, the entry tear site and size of the first intimal flap, aortic maximum diameter at the orifice of left subclavian artery (LSCA), distance between the first entry tear site and the orifice of LSCA, and maximum diameter of aortic true and false lumens were measured prior to implantation of endovascular covered stent-grafts. Data obtained by MSCTA and DSA were then compared. For the entry tear site, MPR, CPR and VR provided a display rate of 95.92, 95.92 and 18.37%, respectively, and the display rate of the intimal flap was 100% in the three methods. MIP did not directly display the entry tear site and intimal flap. For true and false lumens, MPR, CPR, and VR showed a display rate of 100%, while MIP only provided a display rate of 67.35%. When MSCTA was compared with DSA, there was a significant difference in the display of entry site number and position (P<0.05), whereas no significant difference was shown in the measurement of aortic maximum diameter at the orifice of LSCA and the maximum diameter of true and false lumens (P>0.05). In conclusion, among the 3D post-processing reconstruction methods of MSCTA used, MPR and CPR were optimal, followed by VR, and MIP. MSCTA may be the preferable imaging method to diagnose aortic dissection and evaluate treatment of endovascular-covered stent-grafting, preoperatively.
机译:本研究的目的是比较多层螺旋CT血管造影(MSCTA)和数字减影血管造影(DSA)在主动脉夹层的诊断中的作用。共有49位主动脉病变患者接受了增强型计算机断层扫描,并通过体积渲染(VR),最大强度投影(MIP),多平面重建(MPR)和曲面弯曲重建(CPR)重建了三维(3D)图像。计算每种重建方法的入泪部位,内膜瓣,真假管腔的显示率。对于30例DeBakey III型主动脉夹层患者,其进入撕裂部位和第一内膜瓣的大小,左锁骨下动脉孔(LSCA)处的主动脉最大直径,第一次进入撕裂部位与LSCA孔之间的距离以及在植入血管内覆膜支架植入物之前,测量主动脉真腔和假腔的最大直径。然后比较由MSCTA和DSA获得的数据。对于进入撕裂部位,MPR,CPR和VR分别提供95.92、95.92和18.37%的显示率,三种方法中内膜瓣的显示率为100%。 MIP没有直接显示入口撕裂部位和内膜瓣。对于真假流明,MPR,CPR和VR的显示率均为100%,而MIP仅提供67.35%的显示率。当将MSCTA与DSA进行比较时,进入部位的数目和位置的显示存在显着差异(P <0.05),而在LSCA孔处的主动脉最大直径和最大直径的测量中则没有显着差异。真假流明(P> 0.05)。总之,在所使用的MSCTA的3D后处理重建方法中,MPR和CPR是最佳的,其次是VR和MIP。 MSCTA可能是术前诊断主动脉夹层并评估血管内覆膜支架移植治疗的首选影像学方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号