首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >Should I stay or should I go?: consistency and switching of delivery locations among new mothers in 39 Sub-Saharan African and South/Southeast Asian countries
【2h】

Should I stay or should I go?: consistency and switching of delivery locations among new mothers in 39 Sub-Saharan African and South/Southeast Asian countries

机译:我应该留下还是应该去?:撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚/东南亚国家的39个新母亲之间的分娩地点保持一致和转移

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this article is to assess the extent and determinants of switching delivery location between women’s first and second deliveries. We used Demographic and Health Survey data from 39 low- and middle-income countries on delivery locations from >30 000 women who had their first two deliveries in the 5-year survey recall period. Each delivery was characterized as occurring at home or in a health facility, facilities were classified as public- or private-sector. The extent of switching was estimated for each country, region and overall. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed determinants of switching (home to facility or facility to home), using four dimensions (perceived/biological need, socioeconomic characteristics, utilization of care and availability of care). Overall, 49.0% of first and 44.5% of second deliveries occurred in health facilities. Among women who had their first delivery at home, 11.8% used a facility for their second (7.0% public-sector and 4.8% private-sector). Among women who had their first delivery in a facility, 21.6% switched to a home location for their second. The extent of switching varied by country; but the overall net effect was either non-existent (n = 20) or away from facilities (n = 17) in all but two countries—Cambodia and Burkina Faso. Four factors were associated with switching to a facility after a home delivery: higher education, urban residence, non-poor household status and multiple gestation. Majority of women consistently used the same delivery location for their first two deliveries. We found some evidence that where switching occurred, women were being lost from facility care during this important transition, and that all four included dimensions were important determinants of women’s pattern of delivery care use. The relative importance of these factors should be understood in each specific context to improve retention in and provision of quality intrapartum care for women and their newborns.
机译:本文的目的是评估女性第一次分娩和第二次分娩之间切换分娩地点的程度和决定因素。我们使用了来自39个低收入和中等收入国家的人口统计和健康调查数据,这些妇女在5年的调查召回期中前两次分娩的> 30 000名妇女分娩地点。每次分娩的特征是发生在家庭或医疗机构中,机构分为公共部门或私营部门。估计了每个国家,地区和整体的转换程度。多变量逻辑回归模型使用四个维度(感知/生物学需求,社会经济特征,护理利用和护理可用性)评估了转换的决定因素(家庭到机构或机构到家庭)。总体而言,第一次分娩的49.0%和第二次分娩的44.5%是在医疗机构进行的。在第一次在家分娩的妇女中,有11.8%的人第二次使用了设施(公共部门为7.0%,私营部门为4.8%)。在第一次分娩的妇女中,有21.6%的妇女第二次转往家庭。转换的程度因国家/地区而异;但是在除柬埔寨和布基纳法索这两个国家以外的所有国家中,总的净效应要么不存在(n = 20),要么没有设施(n = 17)。有四个因素与上门交付后改用设施有关:高等教育,城市居住,非贫困家庭状况和多胎。大多数妇女在头两次分娩中始终使用相同的分娩地点。我们发现一些证据表明,在发生这种转变的地方,在这个重要的过渡过程中,妇女从设施护理中迷路了,而且所包括的所有四个方面都是妇女使用分娩护理方式的重要决定因素。这些因素的相对重要性应在每种具体情况下加以理解,以提高妇女及其新生儿的保留率和提供优质的产时护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号