首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking >Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations
【2h】

Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations

机译:社交媒体研究伦理:共同关注和实践考虑

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social media Websites (SMWs) are increasingly popular research tools. These sites provide new opportunities for researchers, but raise new challenges for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) that review these research protocols. As of yet, there is little-to-no guidance regarding how an IRB should review the studies involving SMWs. The purpose of this article was to review the common risks inherent in social media research and consider how researchers can consider these risks when writing research protocols. We focused this article on three common research approaches: observational research, interactive research, and survey/interview research. Concomitant with these research approaches, we gave particular attention to the issues pertinent to SMW research, including privacy, consent, and confidentiality. After considering these challenges, we outlined key considerations for both researchers and reviewers when creating or reviewing SMW IRB protocols. Our goal in this article was to provide a detailed examination of relevant ethics and regulatory issues for both researchers and those who review their protocols.
机译:社交媒体网站(SMW)是越来越受欢迎的研究工具。这些站点为研究人员提供了新的机会,但对审查这些研究方案的机构审查委员会(IRB)提出了新的挑战。到目前为止,关于IRB如何审查涉及SMW的研究几乎没有指导。本文的目的是回顾社交媒体研究中固有的常见风险,并考虑研究人员在编写研究协议时如何考虑这些风险。我们将本文重点放在三种常见的研究方法上:观察性研究,交互式研究和调查/访谈研究。与这些研究方法相对应,我们特别关注了与SMW研究相关的问题,包括隐私,同意和保密。考虑了这些挑战之后,我们在创建或审查SMW IRB协议时概述了研究人员和审查人员的主要注意事项。我们在本文中的目标是为研究人员和审查其规程的人员提供有关道德和法规问题的详细检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号