首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diabetes Technology Therapeutics >The Impact of Insulin Pump Therapy on Glycemic Profiles in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the OpT2mise Study
【2h】

The Impact of Insulin Pump Therapy on Glycemic Profiles in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the OpT2mise Study

机译:胰岛素泵治疗对2型糖尿病患者血糖谱的影响:来自OpT2mise研究的数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The OpT2mise randomized trial was designed to compare the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI) on glucose profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes.>Research Design and Methods: Patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of ≥8% (64 mmol/mol) and ≤12% (108 mmol/mol) despite insulin doses of 0.7–1.8 U/kg/day via MDI were randomized to CSII (n=168) or continued MDI (n=163). Changes in glucose profiles were evaluated using continuous glucose monitoring data collected over 6-day periods before and 6 months after randomization.>Results: After 6 months, reductions in HbA1c levels were significantly greater with CSII (−1.1±1.2% [−12.0±13.1 mmol/mol]) than with MDI (−0.4±1.1% [−4.4±12.0 mmol/mol]) (P<0.001). Similarly, compared with patients receiving MDI, those receiving CSII showed significantly greater reductions in 24-h mean sensor glucose (SG) (treatment difference, −17.1 mg/dL; P=0.0023), less exposure to SG >180 mg/dL (−12.4%; P=0.0004) and SG >250 mg/dL (−5.5%; P=0.0153), and more time in the SG range of 70–180 mg/dL (12.3%; P=0.0002), with no differences in exposure to SG<70 mg/dL or in glucose variability. Changes in postprandial (4-h) glucose area under the curve >180 mg/dL were significantly greater with CSII than with MDI after breakfast (−775.9±1,441.2 mg/dL/min vs. −160.7±1,074.1 mg/dL/min; P=0.0015) and after dinner (−731.4±1,580.7 mg/dL/min vs. −71.1±1,083.5 mg/dL/min; P=0.0014).>Conclusions: In patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes, CSII significantly improves selected glucometrics, compared with MDI, without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.
机译:>背景: OpT2mise随机试验旨在比较连续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII)和每日多次注射(MDI)对2型糖尿病患者血糖分布的影响。>研究设计和方法:通过MDI,尽管胰岛素剂量为0.7–1.8 U / kg / day,但糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平≥8%(64 mmol / mol)和≤12%(108 mmol / mol)的患者被随机分配CSII(n = 168)或连续MDI(n = 163)。使用随机分组之前和之后6个月收集的连续血糖监测数据评估血糖分布的变化。>结果:6个月后,CSII降低了HbA1c水平(-1.1±比MDI的(-0.4±1.1%[-4.4±12.0 mmol / mol])高1.2%[-12.0±13.1 mmol / mol])(P <0.001)。同样,与接受MDI的患者相比,接受CSII的患者显示24小时平均传感器葡萄糖(SG)的降低明显更大(治疗差异,-17.1 −mg / dL; P = 0.0023),较少接触SG> 180 mg / dL( -12.4%; P = 0.0004)和SG> 250 mg / dL(-5.5%; P = 0.0153),并且在SG范围70-180 mg / dL(12.3%; P = 0.0002)时有更多时间,没有SG <70μmg/ dL或葡萄糖变异性的差异。早餐后CSII曲线下餐后(4-h)葡萄糖面积的变化显着大于早餐后的MDI(−775.9±1,441.2 mg / dL / min相对于−160.7±1,074.1 mg / dL / min; P = 0.0015)和晚餐后(−731.4±1,580.7 mg / dL / min相对于−71.1±1,083.5 mg / dL / min; P = 0.0014)。>结论:在亚最佳控制2型患者中糖尿病,CSII与MDI相比,显着改善了选定的血糖指标,而没有增加低血糖的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号