首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diabetes Technology Therapeutics >Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes
【2h】

Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes

机译:在患有1型糖尿病的成年人中进行有氧运动期间滞后时间仍然保持着更新的实时连续葡萄糖监测技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices help detect glycemic excursions associated with exercise, meals, and insulin dosing in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, the delay between interstitial and blood glucose may result in CGM underestimating the true change in glycemia during activity. The purpose of this study was to examine CGM discrepancies during exercise and the meal postexercise versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).>Methods: Seventeen adults with T1D using insulin pump therapy and CGM completed 60 min of aerobic exercise on three occasions. A standardized meal was given 30 min postexercise. SMBG was measured during exercise and in recovery using OmniPod® Personal Diabetes Manager (PDM; Insulet, Billerica, MA) with built-in glucose meter (FreeStyle; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), while CGM was measured with Dexcom G4® with 505 algorithm (n = 4) or G5® (n = 13), which were calibrated with subjects' own PDM.>Results: SMBG showed a large drop in glycemia during exercise, while CGM showed a lag of 12 ± 11 (mean ± standard deviation) minutes and bias of −7 ± 19 mg/dL/min during activity. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for CGM versus SMBG was 13 (6–22)% [median (interquartile range)] during exercise and 8 (5–14)% during mealtime. Clarke error grids showed CGM values were in zones A and B 94%–99% of the time for SMBG.>Conclusion: In summary, the drop in CGM lags behind the drop in blood glucose during prolonged aerobic exercise by 12 ± 11 min, and MARD increases to 13 (6–22)% during exercise as well. Therefore, if hypoglycemia is suspected during exercise, individuals should confirm glucose levels with a capillary glucose measurement.
机译:>背景:实时连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)设备可帮助检测与1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的运动,进餐和胰岛素剂量相关的血糖波动。然而,间质和血糖之间的延迟可能导致CGM低估了运动过程中血糖的真实变化。这项研究的目的是检查运动过程中CGM的差异以及运动后进餐与自我监测血糖(SMBG)的差异。>方法:十七名使用胰岛素泵治疗和CGM完成T1D的成年人完成了60分钟有氧运动三种情况。运动后30分钟给予标准餐。 SMBG在运动和恢复过程中使用内置血糖仪(FreeStyle; Abbott Laboratories,Abbott Park,IL)的OmniPod ® Personal Diabetes Manager(PDM; Insulet,Billerica,MA)进行测量,同时使用CGM使用Dexcom G4 ®和505算法(n = 4)或G5 ®(n = 13)进行测量,并使用受试者自己的PDM进行校准。>结果: SMBG在运动过程中血糖下降幅度较大,而CGM在运动过程中出现12±±11分钟(平均±标准偏差)分钟的滞后和-7±±19 mg / dL / min的偏差。 CGM与SMBG的平均绝对相对差异(MARD)在运动期间为13(6-22)%[中位数(四分位间距)],在进餐期间为8(5-14)%。 Clarke误差网格显示SMBG的时间中CGM值处于A区和B区的时间为94%–99%。>结论:总之,在长时间的有氧运动中,CGM的下降落后于血糖的下降在运动过程中,速度提高了12±11分钟,MARD也增加到13(6-22)%。因此,如果怀疑在运动过程中出现低血糖,则个人应通过毛细血管葡萄糖测量来确认葡萄糖水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号