首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioinformatics >How and when should interactome-derived clusters be used to predict functional modules and protein function?
【2h】

How and when should interactome-derived clusters be used to predict functional modules and protein function?

机译:相互作用组衍生的簇应如何以及何时用于预测功能模块和蛋白质功能?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Motivation: Clustering of protein–protein interaction networks is one of the most common approaches for predicting functional modules, protein complexes and protein functions. But, how well does clustering perform at these tasks?>Results: We develop a general framework to assess how well computationally derived clusters in physical interactomes overlap functional modules derived via the Gene Ontology (GO). Using this framework, we evaluate six diverse network clustering algorithms using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and show that (i) the performances of these algorithms can differ substantially when run on the same network and (ii) their relative performances change depending upon the topological characteristics of the network under consideration. For the specific task of function prediction in S.cerevisiae, we demonstrate that, surprisingly, a simple non-clustering guilt-by-association approach outperforms widely used clustering-based approaches that annotate a protein with the overrepresented biological process and cellular component terms in its cluster; this is true over the range of clustering algorithms considered. Further analysis parameterizes performance based on the number of annotated proteins, and suggests when clustering approaches should be used for interactome functional analyses. Overall our results suggest a re-examination of when and how clustering approaches should be applied to physical interactomes, and establishes guidelines by which novel clustering approaches for biological networks should be justified and evaluated with respect to functional analysis.>Contact: >Supplementary information: are available at Bioinformatics online.
机译:>动机:蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络的聚类是预测功能模块,蛋白质复合物和蛋白质功能的最常用方法之一。但是,聚类在这些任务上的执行情况如何?>结果:我们开发了一个通用框架来评估物理交互组中的计算派生簇与通过基因本体论(GO)派生的功能模块重叠的程度。使用此框架,我们评估了使用酿酒酵母的六种不同的网络聚类算法,结果表明:(i)在同一网络上运行时,这些算法的性能可能存在实质性差异;(ii)根据网络的拓扑特性,其相对性能会发生变化在考虑中。对于酿酒酵母中功能预测的特定任务,我们证明了令人惊讶的是,一种简单的非聚类的内关联方法比基于蛋白质的生物过程和细胞成分术语被过度注释的广泛使用的基于聚类的方法表现更好。它的集群;在考虑的聚类算法范围内,这是正确的。进一步的分析根据注释的蛋白质数量对性能进行参数化,并建议何时应将聚类方法用于相互作用基因组功能分析。总体而言,我们的研究结果建议重新研究何时以及如何将聚类方法应用于物理相互作用组,并建立指导原则,据此对生物网络的新型聚类方法进行功能分析并进行评估。>联系方式: >补充信息:可从在线生物信息学获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号