首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Epidemiology >The Thompson-McFadden Commission and Joseph Goldberger: Contrasting 2 Historical Investigations of Pellagra in Cotton Mill Villages in South Carolina
【2h】

The Thompson-McFadden Commission and Joseph Goldberger: Contrasting 2 Historical Investigations of Pellagra in Cotton Mill Villages in South Carolina

机译:汤普森·麦克法登委员会和约瑟夫·戈德伯格:对比南卡罗来纳州棉纺厂村庄的皮拉格拉的2项历史调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As pellagra reached epidemic proportions in the United States in the early 20th century, 2 teams of investigators assessed its incidence in cotton mill villages in South Carolina. The first, the Thompson-McFadden Commission, concluded that pellagra was likely infectious. The second, a Public Health Service investigation led by Joseph Goldberger, concluded that pellagra was caused by a dietary deficiency. In this paper, we recount the history of the 2 investigations and consider how the differences between the 2 studies' designs, measurements, analyses, and interpretations led to different conclusions. Because the novel dietary assessment strategy was a key feature of the Public Health Service's study design, we incorporated simulated measurement error in a reanalysis of the Public Health Service's data to assess whether this specific difference affected the divergent conclusions.
机译:随着20世纪初美国糙皮病达到流行病的程度,有2个研究小组评估了它在南卡罗来纳州棉纺厂村庄中的发病率。第一个是汤普森-麦克法登委员会,得出的结论是,糙皮病可能具有传染性。第二个是由约瑟夫·戈德伯格(Joseph Goldberger)领导的公共卫生服务调查,得出的结论是,糙皮病是由饮食缺乏引起的。在本文中,我们回顾了这两项研究的历史,并考虑了这两项研究的设计,测量,分析和解释之间的差异如何导致不同的结论。由于新颖的饮食评估策略是公共卫生服务局研究设计的关键特征,因此我们在重新分析公共卫生服务局数据时纳入了模拟测量误差,以评估这种具体差异是否影响了不同的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号