首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of the Entomological Society of America >Interspecific Differences in Feeding Behavior and Survival Under Food-Limited Conditions for Larval Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)
【2h】

Interspecific Differences in Feeding Behavior and Survival Under Food-Limited Conditions for Larval Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

机译:食物限制条件下白纹伊蚊和埃及伊蚊(Diptera:Culicidae)在进食受限条件下的进食行为和存活的种间差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aedes albopictus has replaced Aedes aegypti in much of the latter species’ historic range within the United States. The leading hypothesis for this displacement is exclusion via resource competition; however, the proximate mechanism producing a competitive advantage for A. albopictus over A. aegypti has not been identified. We performed laboratory experiments to test the hypotheses that these species differ in feeding behavior, and that these differences result in differences in survival when resources are scarce. Differences in feeding behavior were assessed in three environments with food (growing microorganisms) available: 1) in fluid only; 2) on leaf surfaces only; 3) or both in fluid and on leaf surfaces. We determined behavior of larvae in these environments, recording their positions (bottom, wall, leaf, top, or middle) and activities (browsing, filtering, resting, or thrashing) using instantaneous scan censuses. A. albopictus spent significantly more time at leaf surfaces, whereas A. aegypti spent more time engaging in nonfeeding activities. Both species showed a significant shift in foraging activity toward leaves when leaves were available. In a second experiment, we recorded survivorship for individuals raised in two treatment combinations: whole or half 17-mm disks of live oak leaves, with or without direct access to the leaf surface (controlled using nylon mesh, which allowed movement of microscopic organisms, but prevented mosquito larva movement between container sides). After 31 d, survivorship of A. albopictus was significantly greater than that of A. aegypti regardless of treatments. Moreover, A. albopictus showed significantly greater survivorship compared with A. aegypti when deprived of access to leaf surfaces and in whole leaf disk treatments, suggesting superior resource-harvesting ability for A. albopictus. Our experiments suggest that differences in foraging behavior contribute to the competitive advantage of A. albopictus over A. aegypti that has been observed in North America.
机译:在美国,白纹伊蚊已经取代了埃及白纹伊蚊。这种流离失所的主要假说是通过资源竞争来排斥。然而,尚未发现产生白纹线虫相对于埃及线虫竞争优势的最接近机制。我们进行了实验室实验,以检验以下假设:这些物种的进食行为不同,并且在资源匮乏时这些差异会导致生存差异。在三种可用食物(生长微生物)的环境中评估了喂养行为的差异:1)仅在液体中; 2)仅在叶子表面; 3)或同时在流体和叶片表面上。我们确定了幼虫在这些环境中的行为,并使用即时扫描普查记录了它们的位置(底部,墙壁,叶片,顶部或中间)和活动(浏览,过滤,静止或打动)。白蚁曲霉在叶片表面花费更多的时间,而埃及曲霉则花费更多的时间从事非摄食活动。当有叶子时,两个物种都显示出向叶子的觅食活动的显着变化。在第二个实验中,我们记录了通过两种处理组合饲养的个体的存活情况:整个或半个17毫米的活橡树叶圆盘,可以直接进入或不直接进入叶片表面(使用尼龙网控制,允许微生物移动,但可以防止蚊虫幼虫在容器两侧之间移动。 31 d后,无论采用何种治疗方法,白纹曲霉的存活率均显着高于埃及埃及曲霉。此外,当被剥夺了接触叶片表面的能力以及在整个叶盘处理中,白纹线虫比埃及线虫的存活率要高得多,这表明白纹线虫具有更好的资源采集能力。我们的实验表明,觅食行为的差异有助于在北美发现白纹线虫相对于埃及埃及线虫的竞争优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号