首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Epidemiology >Validity of a Multipass Web-based 24-Hour Self-Administered Recall for Assessment of Total Energy Intake in Blacks and Whites
【2h】

Validity of a Multipass Web-based 24-Hour Self-Administered Recall for Assessment of Total Energy Intake in Blacks and Whites

机译:基于Web的多遍24小时自我管理召回对黑人和白人总能量摄入量评估的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To date, Web-based 24-hour recalls have not been validated using objective biomarkers. From 2006 to 2009, the validity of 6 Web-based DietDay 24-hour recalls was tested among 115 black and 118 white healthy adults from Los Angeles, California, by using the doubly labeled water method, and the results were compared with the results of the Diet History Questionnaire, a food frequency questionnaire developed by the National Cancer Institute. The authors performed repeated measurements in a subset of 53 subjects approximately 6 months later to estimate the stability of the doubly labeled water measurement. The attenuation factors for the DietDay recall were 0.30 for blacks and 0.26 for whites. For the Diet History Questionnaire, the attenuation factors were 0.15 and 0.17 for blacks and whites, respectively. Adjusted correlations between true energy intake and the recalls were 0.50 and 0.47 for blacks and whites, respectively, for the DietDay recall. For the Diet History Questionnaire, they were 0.34 and 0.36 for blacks and whites, respectively. The rate of underreporting of more than 30% of calories was lower with the recalls than with the questionnaire (25% and 41% vs. 34% and 52% for blacks and whites, respectively). These findings suggest that Web-based DietDay dietary recalls offer an inexpensive and widely accessible dietary assessment alternative, the validity of which is equally strong among black and white adults. The validity of the Web-administered recall was superior to that of the paper food frequency questionnaire.
机译:迄今为止,尚未使用客观的生物标记物对基于网络的24小时召回进行验证。从2006年到2009年,使用双标记水方法对来自加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的115位黑人和118位白人健康成年人进行了6次基于网络的DietDay 24小时召回的有效性测试,并将结果与饮食史问卷,由美国国家癌症研究所开发的食物频率问卷。作者在大约6个月后对53个受试者的子集中进行了重复测量,以评估双标记水测量的稳定性。 DietDay召回的衰减因子是,黑人为0.30,白人为0.26。对于饮食史问卷,黑人和白人的衰减因子分别为0.15和0.17。 DietDay召回的黑人和白人的真实能量摄入与召回之间的调整相关系数分别为0.50和0.47。对于饮食史问卷,黑人和白人分别为0.34和0.36。召回的漏报率超过30%,低于问卷调查表(分别为25%和41%,而黑人和白人分别为34%和52%)。这些发现表明,基于网络的DietDay饮食召回提供了一种廉价且可广泛使用的饮食评估方案,其有效性在黑人和白人中同样强大。网络召回的有效性优于纸质食物频率调查问卷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号