首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Epidemiology >History of Benzodiazepine Prescriptions and Risk of Dementia: Possible Bias Due to Prevalent Users and Covariate Measurement Timing in a Nested Case-Control Study
【2h】

History of Benzodiazepine Prescriptions and Risk of Dementia: Possible Bias Due to Prevalent Users and Covariate Measurement Timing in a Nested Case-Control Study

机译:苯二氮卓类药物处方的历史和痴呆的风险:嵌套病例对照研究中由于普遍的使用者和协变量测量时机可能引起的偏见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous estimates of whether long-term exposure to benzodiazepines increases dementia risk are conflicting and are compromised by the difficulty of controlling for confounders and by reverse causation. We investigated how estimates for the association between benzodiazepine use and later dementia incidence varied based on study design choices, using a case-control study nested within the United Kingdom’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink. A total of 40,770 dementia cases diagnosed between April 2006 and July 2015 were matched on age, sex, available data history, and deprivation to 283,933 control subjects. Benzodiazepines and Z-drug prescriptions were ascertained in a drug-exposure period 4–20 years before dementia diagnosis. Estimates varied with the inclusion of new or prevalent users, with the timing of covariate ascertainment, and with varying time between exposure and outcome. There was no association between any new prescription of benzodiazepines and dementia (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.07), whereas an inverse association was observed among prevalent users (adjusted OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.95), although this was likely induced by unintentional adjustment for colliders. By considering the choice of confounders and timing of exposure and covariate measurement, our findings overall are consistent with no causal effect of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs on dementia incidence.
机译:先前关于长期接触苯并二氮杂whether是否会增加痴呆症风险的估计是相互矛盾的,并且因难以控制混杂因素和因果关系而受到损害。我们使用嵌套在英国临床实践研究数据链接中的病例对照研究,调查了根据研究设计选择对苯二氮卓类药物使用与以后痴呆症发病率之间的相关性的估计如何变化。在2006年4月至2015年7月之间诊断的40,770例痴呆病例中,年龄,性别,可用数据历史记录和剥夺与283,933名对照对象相匹配。在痴呆症诊断之前的4至20年的药物暴露期内确定苯二氮卓类和Z药物处方。估计值随新用户或流行用户的加入,协变量确定的时间以及暴露和结果之间的时间而异。苯二氮卓类药物与痴呆的任何新处方之间均无关联(调整后的优势比(OR)= 1.03,95%置信区间(CI):1.00、1.07),而在经常使用的使用者中观察到了反向关联(调整后的OR = 0.91, 95%CI:0.87、0.95),尽管这可能是由于对撞机的无意调整引起的。通过考虑混杂因素的选择以及暴露时间和协变量测量,我们的发现总体上与苯二氮卓类药物或Z药物对痴呆症的发生没有因果关系一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号