首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) assessment in epilepsy: a review of epilepsy-specific PROs according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory requirements
【2h】

Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) assessment in epilepsy: a review of epilepsy-specific PROs according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory requirements

机译:癫痫患者的患者报告结果(PRO)评估:根据美国食品药品管理局(FDA)法规要求对癫痫特定PRO的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite collection of patient reported outcome (PRO) data in clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), PRO results are not being routinely reported on European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) product labels. This review aimed to evaluate epilepsy-specific PRO instruments against FDA regulatory standards for supporting label claims. Structured literature searches were conducted in Embase and Medline databases to identify epilepsy-specific PRO instruments. Only instruments that could potentially be impacted by pharmacological treatment, were completed by adults and had evidence of some validation work were selected for review. A total of 26 PROs were reviewed based on criteria developed from the FDA regulatory standards. The ability to meet these criteria was classified as either full, partial or no evidence, whereby partial reflected some evidence but not enough to comprehensively address the FDA regulatory standards. Most instruments provided partial evidence of content validity. Input from clinicians and literature was common although few involved patients in both item generation and cognitive debriefing. Construct validity was predominantly compromised by no evidence of a-priori hypotheses of expected relationships. Evidence for test-retest reliability and internal consistency was available for most PROs although few included complete results regarding all subscales and some failed to reach recommended thresholds. The ability to detect change and interpretation of change were not investigated in most instruments and no PROs had published evidence of a conceptual framework. The study concludes that none of the 26 have the full evidence required by the FDA to support a label claim, and all require further research to support their use as an endpoint. The Subjective Handicap of Epilepsy (SHE) and the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) have the fewest gaps that would need to be addressed through additional research prior to any FDA regulatory submission, although the NDDI-E was designed as a screening tool and is therefore unlikely to be suitable as an instrument for capturing change in a clinical trial and the SHE lacks the conceptual focus on signs and symptoms favoured by the FDA.
机译:尽管在抗癫痫药物(AED)的临床试验中收集了患者报告的结局(PRO)数据,但PRO的结果并未在欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和食品药品管理局(FDA)的产品标签上例行报告。这项审查旨在根据支持标签声明的FDA监管标准评估癫痫病的PRO仪器。在Embase和Medline数据库中进行结构化文献检索,以鉴定癫痫特异性PRO仪器。只有那些可能会受到药理学影响的器械,成年人才能完成的,有某些验证工作证据的器械才被选中进行审查。根据FDA监管标准制定的标准,共审查了26个PRO。满足这些标准的能力分为完全,部分或没有证据,其中部分反映了一些证据,但不足以全面解决FDA监管标准。大多数工具提供了内容有效性的部分证据。尽管很少有患者参与项目生成和认知汇报,但临床医生和文献的输入很普遍。没有任何关于预期关系的先验假说的证据,大大削弱了结构的有效性。大多数PRO都有重测信度和内部一致性的证据,尽管很少有人提供有关所有子量表的完整结果,还有一些未能达到建议的阈值。在大多数工具中,没有研究发现变化和解释变化的能力,并且没有专业人士发布过概念框架的证据。该研究得出的结论是,这26种药物中没有一种具有FDA要求的完整证据来支持标签声明,并且所有这些都需要进一步研究以支持将其用作终点。癫痫的主观障碍(SHE)和癫痫的神经系统疾病抑郁量表(NDDI-E)的差距最小,尽管在任何FDA法规提交之前,都需要通过其他研究来解决,尽管NDDI-E被设计为筛查工具,因此不太可能适合作为临床试验中捕获变化的工具,并且SHE缺乏FDA偏爱的症状和体征的概念重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号