首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Pharmacologica Sinica >The efficacy and safety of cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance after coronary stent implantation: a combined clinical study and computational system pharmacology analysis
【2h】

The efficacy and safety of cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance after coronary stent implantation: a combined clinical study and computational system pharmacology analysis

机译:西洛他唑替代阿司匹林在中国冠状动脉支架植入术后不耐受阿司匹林的患者的疗效和安全性:结合临床研究和计算机系统药理学分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is the standard regimen to achieve rapid platelet inhibition and prevent thrombotic events. Currently, little information is available regarding alternative antiplatelet therapy in patients with an allergy or intolerance to aspirin. Although cilostazol is already a common alternative to aspirin in clinical practice in China, its efficacy and safety remain to be determined. We retrospectively analyzed 613 Chinese patients who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among them, 405 patients received standard DAT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) and 205 patients were identified with intolerance to aspirin and received alternative DAT (cilostazol plus clopidogrel). There were no significant differences between the two groups in their baseline clinical characteristics. The main outcomes of the study included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and bleeding events during 12 months of follow-up. The MACEs endpoint was reached in 10 of 205 patients treated with cilostazol (4.9%) and in 34 of 408 patients treated with aspirin (8.3%). No statistically significant difference was observed in MACEs between the two groups. However, patients in the cilostazol group had less restenosis than did patients in the aspirin group (1.5% vs 4.9%, P=0.035). The occurrence of bleeding events tended to be lower in the cilostazol group (0.49% vs 2.7%, P=0.063). These clinical observations were further analyzed using network system pharmacology analysis, and the outcomes were consistent with clinical observations and preclinical data reports. We conclude that in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance undergoing coronary stent implantation, the combination of clopidogrel with cilostazol may be an efficacious and safe alternative to the standard DAT regimen.
机译:阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗(DAT)是实现快速抑制血小板生成和预防血栓形成事件的标准方案。目前,对于对阿司匹林过敏或不耐受的患者进行抗血小板替代治疗的信息很少。尽管西洛他唑已经在中国临床实践中替代阿司匹林,但其疗效和安全性尚待确定。我们回顾性分析了613例接受了原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的中国患者。其中,有405例患者接受了标准DAT(阿司匹林加氯吡格雷),有205例患者被确认对阿司匹林不耐受,并接受了替代DAT(西洛他唑加氯吡格雷)。两组的基线临床特征无明显差异。该研究的主要结果包括在随访的12个月中的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和出血事件。在205例接受西洛他唑治疗的患者中,有10例达到了MACEs终点(4.9%),在408例接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中有34例达到了MACEs(8.3%)。两组之间的MACE差异均无统计学意义。但是,西洛他唑组的患者再狭窄程度低于阿司匹林组(1.5%vs 4.9%,P = 0.035)。西洛他唑组出血事件的发生率较低(0.49%比2.7%,P = 0.063)。使用网络系统药理学分析进一步分析了这些临床观察结果,其结果与临床观察结果和临床前数据报告一致。我们得出的结论是,在接受冠状动脉支架植入术的中国阿司匹林耐受性不佳的患者中,氯吡格雷与西洛他唑的组合可能是标准DAT方案的有效替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号