首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines >Are Biomedicine Health Practitioners Ready to Collaborate with Traditional Health Practitioners in HIV and AIDS Care in Tutume Sub District of Botswana
【2h】

Are Biomedicine Health Practitioners Ready to Collaborate with Traditional Health Practitioners in HIV and AIDS Care in Tutume Sub District of Botswana

机译:博茨瓦纳图图美亚区的生物医学保健从业者准备好与传统保健从业者在艾滋病毒和艾滋病护理方面开展合作吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to determine BHPs' views on collaboration with THPs in Tutume sub district, identify collaboration activities that have been going on and determine approaches to collaboration that are acceptable to BHPs. A cross sectional survey was conducted with a convenient sample of 60 biomedicine health practitioners. The sample was drawn from two primary hospitals and clinics in Tutume Sub-District, Botswana. A pre-tested self administered questionnaire with open- and closed ended questions was used to obtain information. Majority of BHPs were in favour of collaboration despite the low levels of collaboration with THPs and low levels of awareness of the policy on collaboration. Patient referral was the preferred approach to collaboration but majority of BHPs would not refer patients to THPs. Despite the fact that BHPs were not familiar with most traditional practices they were of the opinion that they will not learn anything from THPs but were favourable towards exchange of information and biomedical skills. We conclude that BHPs were not ready to collaborate with THPs in HIV and AIDS care. BHPs wanted collaboration to be on their terms i.e. they prefer the collaboration to be limited to one way referrals from TPHs to BHPs, they will teach THPs but they were not willing to learn from them and they had negative opinions of the traditional health practice. Therefore, lack of specific guidelines on collaboration negatively affected collaborative efforts in the sub-district.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定必和必拓对图特梅子地区与THP进行合作的看法,确定正在进行的协作活动,并确定BHP可接受的合作方式。使用60名生物医学保健从业人员的方便样本进行了横断面调查。该样本取自博茨瓦纳图图梅区的两家主要医院和诊所。使用预先测试过的,带有开放式和封闭式问题的自我管理问卷来获取信息。尽管与THP的合作程度较低,并且对合作政策的了解程度较低,但大多数BHP还是赞成合作。推荐患者转诊是合作的首选方法,但是大多数BHP不会将患者推荐给THP。尽管必和必拓不熟悉大多数传统做法,但他们认为他们不会向THP学习任何东西,但有利于信息和生物医学技能的交流。我们得出的结论是,必和必拓尚未准备好与THP在HIV和AIDS护理方面进行合作。必和必拓希望合作能够按照自己的条件进行,即他们希望合作仅限于从TPH向BHP进行推荐的一种方式,他们会教THP,但他们不愿意向他们学习,并且他们对传统卫生实践持负面看法。因此,缺乏有关协作的特定指南会对街道的协作工作产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号