首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Mens Health >Evaluation of the Making Employment Needs (MEN) Count Intervention toReduce HIV/STI Risk for Black Heterosexual Men in Washington DC
【2h】

Evaluation of the Making Employment Needs (MEN) Count Intervention toReduce HIV/STI Risk for Black Heterosexual Men in Washington DC

机译:对使就业需求(MEN)计数干预的评估降低华盛顿特区黑人异性恋男子的HIV / STI风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of MEN Count, a race- and gender-tailored three-session counseling intervention, on HIV/STI incidence as well as housing and employment. A two-armed quasi-experimental design was used to compare MEN Count to an attention comparison condition focused on stress reduction, from March 2014 to April 2017. Participants (N = 454) were Black heterosexual men in Washington DC, largely recruited from an STI clinic. Multivariate difference-in-difference regressions assessed whether the intervention was associated with significant changes in the outcomes set, which included nonviral STI incidence, sexual risk categorization, housing, and employment. Significant improvements over time were observed across both treatment arms for all outcomes (p < .05). Reductions in unemployment were significantly greater for intervention than for control participants (AOR unemployment = 0.48, 95% CI [0.23, 0.99]). Improvements in other outcomes did not differ significantly by treatment group. In dose analyses, participants receiving all intervention sessions were significantly less likely than control participants to have experienced homelessness in the 90 days prior (AOR= 0.31, 95% CI [0.10, 0.96]) and to be unemployed (AOR = 0.37,95% CI [0.14, 0.96]). The MEN Count intervention offers a promising approach toaddress structural risk factors for STI, but not STI itself, among this largelySTI clinic–based sample.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是评估MEN Count(一项针对种族和性别而定的三阶段咨询干预措施)对HIV / STI发病率以及住房和就业的影响。 2014年3月至2017年4月,采用两臂准实验设计将MEN Count与关注压力减轻的注意力比较条件进行比较。参与者(N = 454)是华盛顿特区的黑人异性恋男人,主要是从STI招募诊所。多元差异差异回归评估了干预措施是否与结果集的重大变化相关,其中包括非病毒性传播感染发病率,性风险分类,住房和就业。随着时间的推移,两个治疗组的所有结局均出现了显着改善(p <.05)。与对照组相比,干预组的失业率降低幅度更大(AOR失业率= 0.48,95%CI [0.23,0.99])。治疗组其他结局的改善无明显差异。在剂量分析中,接受所有干预措施的参与者比对照组的参与者在90天之前无家可归的经历(AOR = 0.31,95%CI [0.10,0.96])和失业(AOR = 0.37,95%CI [0.14,0.96]。 MEN Count干预提供了一种有前途的方法在很大程度上解决了性传播感染的结构性风险因素,而不是性传播感染本身STI诊所样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号