首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health >Getting to the Truth: Evaluating National Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns
【2h】

Getting to the Truth: Evaluating National Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns

机译:实话实说:评估全国烟草反营销活动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. This study examines how the American Legacy Foundation's “truth” campaign and Philip Morris's “Think. Don't Smoke” campaign have influenced youths' attitudes, beliefs, and intentions toward tobacco.Methods. We analyzed 2 telephone surveys of 12- to 17-year-olds with multivariate logistic regressions: a baseline survey conducted before the launch of “truth” and a second survey 10 months into the “truth” campaign.Results. Exposure to “truth” countermarketing advertisements was consistently associated with an increase in anti-tobacco attitudes and beliefs, whereas exposure to Philip Morris advertisements generally was not. In addition, those exposed to Philip Morris advertisements were more likely to be open to the idea of smoking.Conclusions. Whereas exposure to the “truth” campaign positively changed youths' attitudes toward tobacco, the Philip Morris campaign had a counterproductive influence. (Am J Public Health. 2002;92:901–907)
机译:目标。这项研究研究了美国传统基金会的“真相”运动和菲利普·莫里斯的“思想”。 “不要吸烟”运动影响了年轻人对烟草的态度,信仰和意图。我们使用多元logistic回归分析了2项针对12至17岁儿童的电话调查:一项是在“真相”启动之前进行的基线调查,另一项是在“真相”活动开始10个月后进行的第二次调查。结果。接触“真相”的反营销广告与反烟草态度和信念的增加一直保持一致,而接触菲利普·莫里斯广告则通常没有。此外,那些接触菲利普莫里斯广告的人更愿意接受吸烟的想法。接触“真相”运动积极改变了年轻人对烟草的态度,而菲利普莫里斯运动却产生了适得其反的影响。 (Am J Public Health。2002; 92:901–907)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号