首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >Adapting and Evaluating a Rapid Low-Cost Method to Enumerate Flies in the Household Setting
【2h】

Adapting and Evaluating a Rapid Low-Cost Method to Enumerate Flies in the Household Setting

机译:适应和评估一种快速低成本的方法来枚举家庭环境中的苍蝇

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Diarrhea is a leading cause of death among children under 5 years of age worldwide. Flies are important vectors of diarrheal pathogens in settings lacking networked sanitation services. There is no standardized method for measuring fly density in households; many methods are cumbersome and unvalidated. We adapted a rapid, low-cost fly enumeration technique previously developed for industrial settings, the Scudder fly grill, for field use in household settings. We evaluated its performance in comparison to a sticky tape fly trapping method at latrine and food preparation areas among households in rural Kenya. The grill method was more sensitive; it detected the presence of any flies at 80% (433/543) of sampling locations versus 64% (348/543) of locations by the sticky tape. We found poor concordance between the two methods, suggesting that standardizing protocols is important for comparison of fly densities between studies. Fly species identification was feasible with both methods; however, the sticky tape trap allowed for more nuanced identification. Both methods detected a greater presence of bottle flies near latrines compared with food preparation areas (P < 0.01). The grill method detected more flies at the food preparation area compared with near the latrine (P = 0.014) while the sticky tape method detected no difference. We recommend the Scudder grill as a sensitive fly enumeration tool that is rapid and low cost to implement.
机译:腹泻是全球5岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。苍蝇是缺乏网络卫生服务的环境中腹泻病原体的重要媒介。没有测量家庭蝇密度的标准化方法。许多方法繁琐且未经验证。我们采用了以前为工业环境开发的快速,低成本的蝇枚举技术,即Scudder蝇网,用于家庭环境中的现场使用。与在肯尼亚农村地区的家庭厕所和食品准备区使用胶带蝇捕蝇法相比,我们评估了其性能。烧烤法更灵敏。它检测到在采样位置的80%(433/543)处有苍蝇,而胶带则检测到64%(348/543)的苍蝇。我们发现这两种方法之间的一致性差,这表明标准化协议对于比较研究之间的蝇密度很重要。两种方法都可以进行蝇类鉴定。但是,胶带陷阱可以使您进行更细微的识别。与准备食物的区域相比,这两种方法都检测到厕所附近有更多的瓶蝇(P <0.01)。与在厕所附近(P = 0.014)相比,烧烤法在食品准备区域检测到更多的苍蝇,而胶带法则未发现差异。我们建议使用Scudder烤架作为灵敏的飞点枚举工具,该工具可以快速,低成本地实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号