首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >Centers for Disease Control Light Traps for Monitoring Anopheles arabiensis Human Biting Rates in an Area with Low Vector Density and High Insecticide-Treated Bed Net Use
【2h】

Centers for Disease Control Light Traps for Monitoring Anopheles arabiensis Human Biting Rates in an Area with Low Vector Density and High Insecticide-Treated Bed Net Use

机译:病媒诱捕中心在低媒介密度和高杀虫剂处理床净使用量的地区监测阿拉伯按蚊人类叮咬率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Human landing catches (HLCs) are currently the preferred method to determine vector human biting rates (HBRs), which are key determinants of entomologic inoculation rates and important measures for assessing the impact of vector control efforts. Although HLCs are the most direct means of establishing HBRs, they are labor-intensive, and their use is facing increasing ethical concerns. The relationship between Centers for Disease Control (CDC) light traps and HLC collections was evaluated in Macha, Zambia during the 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 rainy seasons. A CDC light trap captured on average 1.91 (95% confidence interval = 1.16–2.28) times as many An. arabiensis per night as an indoor HLC. Additionally, nets treated with deltamethrin did not affect the numbers of An. arabiensis collected. Our results suggest that in regions where use of vector control interventions is high and vector densities are low, CDC light traps can be used to monitor An. arabiensis HBRs.
机译:目前,人类着陆量(HLC)是确定媒介人类咬伤率(HBR)的首选方法,这是昆虫学接种率的关键决定因素,也是评估媒介控制工作影响的重要措施。尽管HLC是建立HBR的最直接方法,但它们是劳动密集型的,其使用正面临越来越多的道德考量。在2007–2008年和2008–2009年雨季期间,在赞比亚的马哈评估了疾病控制中心(CDC)陷阱和HLC收集之间的关系。捕获的CDC陷阱平均是An的1.91倍(95%置信区间= 1.16–2.28)。每晚用作室内HLC的阿拉伯聚糖。此外,用溴氰菊酯处理过的蚊帐不会影响An的数量。收集到的阿拉伯我们的结果表明,在使用病媒控制干预措施较多且病媒密度较低的地区,CDC光阱可用于监测An。阿拉伯HBR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号