首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Improving guideline concordance in multidisciplinary teams: preliminary results of a cluster-randomized trial evaluating the effect of a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits
【2h】

Improving guideline concordance in multidisciplinary teams: preliminary results of a cluster-randomized trial evaluating the effect of a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits

机译:改善多学科团队的指南一致性:一项集群随机试验的初步结果该试验评估了基于Web的审计和反馈干预以及外访的效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite their widespread use, audit and feedback (A&F) interventions show variable effectiveness on improving professional performance. Based on known facilitators of successful A&F interventions, we developed a web-based A&F intervention with indicator-based performance feedback, benchmark information, action planning and outreach visits. The goal of the intervention was to engage with multidisciplinary teams to overcome barriers to guideline concordance and to improve overall team performance in the field of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). To assess its effectiveness we conducted a cluster-randomized trial in 18 CR clinics (14,847 patients) already working with computerized decision support (CDS). Our preliminary results showed no increase in concordance with guideline recommendations regarding prescription of CR therapies. Future analyses will investigate whether our intervention did improve team performance on other quality indicators.
机译:尽管审计和反馈(A&F)措施得到了广泛使用,但它们在提高专业绩效方面显示出可变的有效性。基于成功的A&F干预的已知推动者,我们开发了基于Web的A&F干预,其中包含基于指标的绩效反馈,基准信息,行动计划和外展访问。干预的目的是与多学科团队合作,以克服指南一致性方面的障碍,并改善心脏康复(CR)领域的团队整体绩效。为了评估其有效性,我们在已经使用计算机决策支持(CDS)的18个CR诊所(14,847位患者)中进行了一项集群随机试验。我们的初步结果显示,与CR治疗处方的指南建议不一致。未来的分析将调查我们的干预是否确实改善了其他质量指标上的团队绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号