首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Comparison of mailed vs. Internet applications of the Delphi technique in clinical informatics research.
【2h】

Comparison of mailed vs. Internet applications of the Delphi technique in clinical informatics research.

机译:比较了Delphi技术在临床信息学研究中的邮寄和Internet应用程序。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Delphi technique provides a means of assessing the judgments of groups of experts without the necessity of having these experts meet together. The technique has been used in health care since the mid-1970s, and has just recently become more common in clinical informatics research. As informatics develops as a specialty, it is logical to consider information technology solutions to research as well as clinical practice problems. The overall purpose of this methodology presentation is to compare a mailed vs. Internet application of the Delphi technique for clinical informatics research. Specifically, this presentation will provide: 1) an overview of the Delphi technique, and 2) a methodological comparison of two research applications of the Delphi technique. Results of the studies will be presented elsewhere.
机译:德尔菲技术提供了一种评估专家组判断的方法,而无需让这些专家聚在一起。自1970年代中期以来,该技术已用于医疗保健,并且最近在临床信息学研究中变得越来越普遍。随着信息学专业的发展,考虑研究和临床实践问题的信息技术解决方案是合乎逻辑的。该方法论演示文稿的总体目的是比较Delphi技术在邮寄与Internet上的临床信息学研究应用。具体而言,本演示文稿将提供:1)Delphi技术的概述,以及2)Delphi技术的两个研究应用的方法学比较。研究结果将在其他地方介绍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号