首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings >Analysis of False Positive Errors of an Acute Respiratory Infection Text Classifier due to Contextual Features
【2h】

Analysis of False Positive Errors of an Acute Respiratory Infection Text Classifier due to Contextual Features

机译:基于上下文特征的急性呼吸道感染文本分类器的误报错误分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Text classifiers have been used for biosurveillance tasks to identify patients with diseases or conditions of interest. When compared to a clinical reference standard of 280 cases of Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI), a text classifier consisting of simple rules and NegEx plus string matching for specific concepts of interest produced 569 (4%) false positive (FP) cases. Using instance level manual annotation we estimate the prevalence of contextual attributes and error types leading to FP cases. Errors were due to (1) Deletion errors from abbreviations, spelling mistakes and missing synonyms (57%); (2) Insertion errors from templated document structures such as check boxes, and lists of signs and symptoms (36%) and; (3) Substitution errors from irrelevant concepts and alternate meanings for the same word (6%). We demonstrate that specific concept attributes contribute to false positive cases. These results will inform modifications and adaptations to improve text classifier performance.
机译:文本分类器已用于生物监视任务,以识别患有目标疾病或状况的患者。与280例急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的临床参考标准相比,由简单规则和NegEx加上针对特定关注概念的字符串匹配组成的文本分类器产生569(4%)假阳性(FP)病例。使用实例级别的手动注释,我们可以估计导致FP案例的上下文属性和错误类型的普遍性。错误归因于(1)缩写中的删除错误,拼写错误和缺少同义词(57%); (2)模板化文档结构中的插入错误,例如复选框,体征和症状列表(36%);以及(3)同一单词(6%)的不相关概念和替代含义的替换错误。我们证明特定的概念属性会导致误报案例。这些结果将为修改和适应提供信息,以改善文本分类器的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号