首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Botany >Exine Micromorphology of Orchidinae (Orchidoideae Orchidaceae): Phylogenetic Constraints or Ecological Influences?
【2h】

Exine Micromorphology of Orchidinae (Orchidoideae Orchidaceae): Phylogenetic Constraints or Ecological Influences?

机译:兰科(兰科兰科)的外在微观形态:系统发育约束还是生态影响?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

• Background and Aims Pollen characters have been widely used in defining evolutionary trends in orchids. In recent years, information on pollination biology and phylogenetic patterns within Orchidinae has become available. Hence, the aim of the presented work is to re-evaluate exine micromorphology of Orchidinae in light of recent phylogenetic studies and to test whether pollen micromorphology strictly depends on phylogenetic relationships among species or whether it is influenced by the marked differences in pollination ecology also reported among closely related species.• Methods Pollen sculpturing of 45 species of Orchidinae and related taxa was investigated using scanning electron microscopy. To cover potential intraspecific variation, several accessions of the same species were examined.• Key Results Orchidinae show remarkable variation in exine sculpturing, with a different level of variation within species groups. In some genera, such as Serapias (rugulate) and Ophrys (psilate to verrucate), intrageneric uniformity corresponds well to a common pollination strategy and close relationships among species. However, little exine variability (psilate–scabrate and scabrate–rugulate) was also found in the genus Anacamptis in spite of striking differences in floral architecture and pollination strategies. A larger variety of exine conditions was found in genera Dactylorhiza (psilate, psilate–scabrate and reticulate) and Orchis s.s. (psilate, reticulate, perforate–rugulate and baculate) where no unequivocal correspondence can be found to either phylogenetic patterns or pollination strategies.• Conclusions Changes in pollen characteristics do not consistently reflect shifts in pollination strategy. A unique trend of exine evolution within Orchidinae is difficult to trace. However, the clades comprising Anacamptis, Neotinea, Ophrys and Serapias show psilate to rugulate or scabrate pollen, while that of the clade comprising Chamorchis, Dactylorhiza, Gymnadenia, Orchis s.s., Platanthera, Pseudorchis and Traunsteinera ranges from psilate to reticulate. Comparison of the data with exine micromorphology from members of the tribe Orchidieae and related tribes suggests a possible general trend from reticulate to psilate.
机译:•背景和目的花粉特征已被广泛用于定义兰花的进化趋势。近年来,关于兰花科内授粉生物学和系统发育模式的信息已可获取。因此,本研究的目的是根据最近的系统发育研究重新评估兰花科的外来微形态,并测试花粉微形态是否严格取决于物种之间的系统发生关系,或者是否受授粉生态学显着差异的影响。方法用扫描电子显微镜研究了兰花科和相关分类单元的45种花粉。为了涵盖潜在的种内变异,检查了同一物种的几种种。•关键结果兰花科的外壁雕刻表现出显着的变异,不同物种之间的变异水平不同。在某些属中,例如Serapias(皱褶)和Ophrys(可缩成小齿),种内均匀性很好地对应于常见的授粉策略和物种之间的紧密关系。然而,尽管花卉结构和授粉策略存在显着差异,但在Anacamptis属中也几乎没有发现外在变异性(扁late状,ca状和sc状具皱纹)。根瘤菌属(psi形,ex形-网状和网状)和Orchis s.s中发现了更多种外来病。 (蝶形,网状,穿孔-皱叶状和球状的),在系统发育模式或授粉策略上都没有明确的对应关系。•结论花粉特性的变化并不能始终反映出授粉策略的变化。兰花科中外生进化的独特趋势很难追踪。但是,包括Anacamptis,Neotinea,Ophrys和Serapias的进化枝显示齿状到褶状或sc状花粉,而包括Chamorchis,Dactylorhiza,Gymnadenia,Orchis s.s,Platanthera,Pseudorchis和Traunsteinera的进化枝则从齿状到网状。对兰花科和相关部落成员的外来微形态学数据进行的比较表明,从网状到宽叶形可能存在总体趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号