首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Quality of Diabetes Care in Family Medicine Practices: Influence of Nurse-Practitioners and Physician’s Assistants
【2h】

Quality of Diabetes Care in Family Medicine Practices: Influence of Nurse-Practitioners and Physician’s Assistants

机译:家庭医学实践中糖尿病护理的质量:执业医师和医师助理的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess whether the quality of diabetes care differs among practices employing nurse-practitioners (NPs), physician’s assistants (PAs), or neither, and which practice attributes contribute to any differences in care.>METHODS This cross-sectional study of 46 family medicine practices from New Jersey and Pennsylvania measured adherence to American Diabetes Association diabetes guidelines via chart audits of 846 patients with diabetes. Practice characteristics were identified by staff surveys. Hierarchical models determined differences between practices with and without NPs or PAs.>RESULTS Compared with practices employing PAs, practices employing NPs were more likely to measure hemoglobin A1c levels (66% vs 33%), lipid levels (80% vs 58%), and urinary microalbumin levels (32% vs 6%); to have treated for high lipid levels (77% vs 56%); and to have patients attain lipid targets (54% vs 37%) (P ≤ .005 for each). Practices with NPs were more likely than physician-only practices to assess hemoglobin A1c levels (66% vs 49%) and lipid levels (80% vs 68%) (P≤.007 for each). These effects could not be attributed to use of diabetes registries, health risk assessments, nurses for counseling, or patient reminder systems. Practices with either PAs or NPs were perceived as busier (P=.03) and had larger total staff (P <.001) than physician-only practices.>CONCLUSIONS Family practices employing NPs performed better than those with physicians only and those employing PAs, especially with regard to diabetes process measures. The reasons for these differences are not clear.
机译:>目的该研究的目的是评估糖尿病护理的质量在使用护士从业者(NPs)和医师助理(PAs)的实践之间是否有所不同,或者哪些实践属性导致了任何差异>方法这项来自新泽西州和宾夕法尼亚州的46种家庭医学实践的横断面研究通过对846名糖尿病患者的图表审计来衡量其对美国糖尿病协会糖尿病指南的依从性。通过员工调查确定了实践特征。层次模型确定有无NP或PA的实践之间的差异。>结果与采用PA的实践相比,采用NP的实践更可能测量血红蛋白A1c水平(66%比33%),脂质水平(80 %vs 58%)和尿微量白蛋白水平(32%vs 6%);治疗过高血脂水平(77%比56%);并让患者达到脂质目标(分别为54%和37%)(每个P≤.005)。 NPs疗法比仅医师疗法更可能评估血红蛋白A1c水平(66%比49%)和脂质水平(80%比68%)(每个P≤.007)。这些影响不能归因于糖尿病登记,健康风险评估,咨询护士或患者提醒系统。与仅医师的做法相比,使用PA或NP的做法被认为更忙(P = .03),并且人员总数更大(P <.001)。>结论 NP的家庭做法比那些仅使用NP的家庭做法表现更好。仅限医师和使用PA的医师,尤其是在糖尿病治疗措施方面。这些差异的原因尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号