首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >NIH Funding in Family Medicine: An Analysis of 2003 Awards
【2h】

NIH Funding in Family Medicine: An Analysis of 2003 Awards

机译:NIH家庭医学基金:2003年奖项分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE We wanted to analyze National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to departments of family medicine.>METHODS We obtained the list of NIH awards to departments of family medicine in 2003, and collected additional information from the Internet regarding each principal investigator (PI), including whether he or she worked primarily in a core (central) organizational component within a family medicine department.>RESULTS One hundred forty-nine NIH awards were granted to 45 departments of family medicine, for a total of $60,085,000. Of 146 awards with a designated PI, approximately two thirds of awards (89, 61%) and awarded dollars ($39,850,000, 70%) went to PIs who were either not full-time family medicine faculty primarily working in family medicine departments, or they were not working in core family medicine organizational components. Few awards to physician PIs in these non-core areas were to family physicians (4 of 37, 11%), whereas most awards to physician PIs in core family medicine areas went to family physicians (40 of 45, 89%). In contrast, most K awards (research career programs) went to PIs in core areas (19 of 23, 83%), and most to family physicians (17 of 23, 74%). Nationally, only 17 R01 awards (research project, traditional) went to family physicians.>CONCLUSIONS Most NIH awards to family medicine departments went to PIs in noncore organizational components, where most physician PIs were not family physicians. Family medicine departments interested in increasing NIH funding may want to consider 4 models that appear to exist: individual faculty in core departmental components, K awards, core faculty also working in university-wide organizational components that provide research infrastructure, and integrating noncore administrative components into the department.
机译:>目的我们想分析美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)对家庭医学部门的奖励。>方法我们在2003年获得了美国国家卫生研究院对家庭医学部门的奖励名单。 >结果:149项NIH奖项,从互联网上收集了有关每个主要研究者(PI)的其他信息,包括他或她是否主要在家庭医学部门的核心(中央)组织工作。授予45个家庭医学部门,总计60,085,000美元。在146个具有指定PI的奖项中,大约三分之二的奖项(89,61%)和奖金(39,850,000,70%)授予了不是主要在家庭医学部门工作的全职家庭医学教师的PI,或者没有在核心家庭医学组织组成部分中工作。在这些非核心领域中,很少有授予家庭医生的PI奖励(37个中的4个,占11%),而在核心家庭医学领域中,大多数PI给予家庭医生的奖励(45个中的40个,占89%)。相反,大多数K奖(研究职业计划)授予核心领域的PI(23个中的19个,占83%),而大多数授予家庭医生(23个中的17个,占74%)。在全国范围内,只有17个R01奖项(传统的研究项目)授予了家庭医生。>结论大多数NIH授予家庭医学部门的奖项都授予了非核心组织组成部分的PI,而大多数医生PI都不是家庭医生。对增加NIH资助感兴趣的家庭医学部门可能要考虑四个似乎存在的模型:核心部门的个人教师,K奖,核心教师还致力于提供研究基础设施的大学范围内的组织部门,以及将非核心行政部门整合到其中部门。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号