首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Gastroenterology >Clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO)
【2h】

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO)

机译:转移性大肠癌治疗的临床实践指南:希腊医学肿瘤医师学会(HeSMO)的共识声明

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is discrepancy and failure to adhere to current international guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in hospitals in Greece and Cyprus. The aim of the present document is to provide a consensus on the multidisciplinary management of metastastic CRC, considering both special characteristics of our Healthcare System and international guidelines. Following discussion and online communication among the members of an executive team chosen by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), a consensus for metastastic CRC disease was developed. Statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology on two voting rounds by invited multidisciplinary international experts on CRC. Statements reaching level of agreement by ≥80% were considered as having achieved large consensus, whereas statements reaching 60-80% moderate consensus. One hundred and nine statements were developed. Ninety experts voted for those statements. The median rate of abstain per statement was 18.5% (range: 0-54%). In the end of the process, all statements achieved a large consensus. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and personalization is emphasized. R0 resection is the only intervention that may offer substantial improvement in the oncological outcomes.
机译:在希腊和塞浦路斯的医院中,现行的转移性结直肠癌(CRC)管理国际准则存在差异和失败之处。本文的目的是就转移性CRC的多学科管理达成共识,同时考虑到我们的医疗保健系统的特殊特征和国际准则。在希腊医学肿瘤学会(HeSMO)选择的执行团队成员之间进行讨论和在线交流之后,就转移性CRC疾病达成了共识。 CRC的多学科国际专家在两次投票中对声明进行了Delphi方法论研究。达到≥80%的共识水平的陈述被认为已达成较大共识,而达到60-80%的中度共识则被认为已达成共识。制定了一百一十九条陈述。九十位专家对这些声明投了赞成票。每个陈述的弃权率中位数为18.5%(范围:0-54%)。最终,所有声明都达成了共识。强调了集中化,多学科团队的护理,遵循准则和个性化的重要性。 R0切除是唯一可以显着改善肿瘤结局的干预措施。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号