【2h】

The Problem Surgical Colleague

机译:问题外科同事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

‘All doctors are problem doctors.’ R Smith
The surgical profession, more than any other medical specialty, is constantly in the limelight. Frequently, concerns are expressed about our colleagues. The concerns may be personality clashes rather than failure in behaviour or performance.Most concerns can be addressed locally with support from the Royal College Invited Review Mechanism of the National Clinical Assessment Service.Unfortunately, if the concern is sufficiently serious or repetitive it may warrant referral to the General Medical Council (GMC) who alone has the right to withdraw a surgeon's medical registration. The surgeon will then be unable to work in the medical profession in this country.The procedures the the surgeon must undergo if referred to the GMC are stressful and protracted. Even if successful the surgeon will probably be expected to undergo a period of retraining that will prove difficult to arrange.New proposals to modify the GMC procedures will reduce the standard of proof to one of ‘balance of probabilities’.The surgical profession should be accountable to its patients and colleagues. Will our Royal College rise to the challenge to establish itself as the bulwark of the surgical profession?
机译:
“所有医生都是问题医生。” R Smith 外科专业比任何其他医学专业都广受关注。通常,我们对同事表示担忧。担忧可能是人格冲突,而不是行为或行为上的失败。大多数担忧可以在国家临床评估局的皇家学院邀请评审机制的支持下本地解决。不幸的是,如果担忧足够严重或重复,则可能需要转介通用医疗理事会(GMC),仅此一家有权撤消外科医生的医疗注册。这样,外科医生将无法在该国的医学界工作。如果将其转介给GMC,则外科医生必须经历的程序繁重且耗时。即使手术成功,也可能需要安排一段时间的再培训,事实证明很难安排再培训。修改GMC程序的新建议会将举证标准降低为``概率平衡''之一。给病人和同事。我们的皇家学院是否会面临挑战,以成为外科专业的堡垒?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号