首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England >A comparison between forefoot plaster and wooden soled shoes following Mitchells osteotomy for hallux valgus.
【2h】

A comparison between forefoot plaster and wooden soled shoes following Mitchells osteotomy for hallux valgus.

机译:米切尔截骨术治疗拇外翻后前脚石膏和木底鞋之间的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Between 1 October 1997 and 1 November 1998, 43 patients (59 feet) were treated with a standard Mitchell's osteotomy for hallux valgus. Of these, 26 patients (36 feet) were treated postoperatively in a forefoot plaster. The other 17 patients (23 feet) were treated with a wooden soled shoe. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for age, indication for surgery, pre-operative deformity or grade of the operating surgeon. There was no significant difference in the mean time immobilised, mean time to union or complications. The patients were interviewed by telephone after a mean follow-up of 9.4 months. There was no significant difference in results between the 2 groups. This suggests that a forefoot plaster following Mitchell's osteotomy is unnecessary. Postoperative mobilisation in a wooden soled shoe can be used as an alternative.
机译:在1997年10月1日至1998年11月1日之间,对43名患者(59英尺)进行了标准的米切尔截骨术治疗拇外翻。其中有26例患者(36英尺)在术后用前足石膏治疗。其他17名患者(23英尺)接受了木制鞋底治疗。两组之间的年龄,手术适应症,术前畸形或手术医师的等级之间无显着差异。平均固定时间,平均愈合时间或并发症没有显着差异。平均随访9.4个月后,通过电话采访了患者。两组之间的结果无显着差异。这表明在Mitchell截骨术之后不需要前脚石膏。可以在木底鞋中进行术后动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号