首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England >Percutaneous (Portex) tracheostomy: an audit of the Newcastle experience.
【2h】

Percutaneous (Portex) tracheostomy: an audit of the Newcastle experience.

机译:经皮(Portex)气管切开术:对纽卡斯尔经验的审核。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to audit the results of percutaneous tracheostomies performed by ENT surgeons in Newcastle. During a 3-year period, 298 tracheostomies: 196 percutaneous and 102 open were studied. A complication rate for percutaneous tracheostomy was found to be 10% compared to 8% for open, this difference was not statistically significant chi 2 = 0.279, P = 0.598 (DF = 1). The indications for percutaneous tracheostomy were mainly limited to respiratory support for intensive care unit patients, whereas the majority of open tracheostomies were performed in the operating theatre. The results of this audit suggest that percutaneous tracheostomy is the method of choice for respiratory support in the intensive care unit and is as safe as the open technique.
机译:这项研究的目的是审核纽卡斯尔的耳鼻喉科医生进行的经皮气管切开术的结果。在3年的时间里,研究了298例气管切开术:196例经皮切开术和102例经皮切开术。经皮气管切开术的并发症发生率为10%,而开放式气管切开术的并发症发生率为8%,差异无统计学意义chi 2 = 0.279,P = 0.598(DF = 1)。经皮气管切开术的适应症主要限于重症监护病房患者的呼吸支持,而大多数开放式气管切开术均在手术室进行。该审核的结果表明,经皮气管切开术是重症监护病房选择呼吸支持的方法,并且与开放技术一样安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号