首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England >Pain quantum and wound healing: a comparison of interrupted inversion PDS and standard nylon sutures in abdominal skin closure.
【2h】

Pain quantum and wound healing: a comparison of interrupted inversion PDS and standard nylon sutures in abdominal skin closure.

机译:疼痛量子和伤口愈合:在腹部皮肤闭合中PDS倒置和标准尼龙缝线间断的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients' postoperative pain experience during 5 days after hernia repairs or upper abdominal procedures was compared when skin closure was achieved by either full thickness interrupted sutures or subcuticular interrupted inversion sutures. Quantitative pain assessments were made using linear analogue charts and standardised analgesic requirements. Clinical advantage for the subcuticular technique was confirmed for the hernia group and possible advantage in the upper abdominal closure, suggested by lesser analgesic requirement. Statistical analysis has lent support to the hernia group findings but is less clear in the upper abdominal group. A comparison of wound healing, sepsis and cosmetic outcome showed no apparent advantage to either method. Economies and patient preference favoured the subcuticular method.
机译:当通过全厚度间断缝合或表皮下间断倒置缝合实现皮肤闭合时,比较了疝修补或上腹部手术5天后患者的术后疼痛经历。使用线性模拟图和标准化镇痛要求进行定量疼痛评估。疝组证实了表皮下技术的临床优势,并且由于较少的止痛要求,可能在上腹部闭合方面具有优势。统计分析对疝气组的发现提供了支持,但在上腹部组中尚不清楚。伤口愈合,败血症和美容效果的比较显示,这两种方法均无明显优势。经济和患者偏好偏爱表皮下方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号