首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases >Suprascapular nerve block in chronic shoulder pain: are the radiologists better?
【2h】

Suprascapular nerve block in chronic shoulder pain: are the radiologists better?

机译:肩shoulder上神经阻滞在慢性肩痛中:放射科医生会更好吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Suprascapular nerve block is a safe and effective treatment for chronic shoulder pain in arthritis, which can be performed either by direct imaging (CT guided) or in the clinic using anatomical landmarks to determine needle placement. >Objective: To compare a CT guided versus an anatomical landmark approach in a randomised, single blind trial examining the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block for shoulder pain in patients with degenerative joint/rotator cuff disease. >Methods: 67 patients with chronic shoulder pain from degenerative disease participated in the trial. 77 shoulders were randomised. The group randomised to receive the block through the anatomical landmark approach received a single suprascapular nerve block. Those in the CT guided group received an injection of methylprednisolone acetate and a smaller volume of bupivacaine around the suprascapular nerve. The patients were followed up for 12 weeks by a "blinded" observer and reviewed at weeks 1, 4, and 12 after the injection. >Results: Significant improvements were seen in all pain scores and disability in the shoulders receiving both types of nerve block, with no significant differences in the improvement in pain and disability between the two approaches at any time. Improvements in pain and disability scores were clinically and statistically significant. No significant adverse effects occurred in either group. Patient satisfaction scores for pain relief using either approach were high. >Conclusion: The CT guided control and landmark approaches to performing suprascapular nerve blocks result in similar significant and prolonged pain and disability reductions; both approaches are safe.
机译:>背景:肩Su上神经阻滞是一种治疗关节炎慢性肩痛的安全有效的方法,可通过直接成像(CT引导)或在临床中使用解剖标志物确定针的位置进行。 >目的:在一项随机,单盲试验中,比较肩guided上神经阻滞对退行性关节/肩袖疾病患者肩痛的疗效,以CT引导法与解剖学界标法进行比较。 >方法: 67名患有退行性疾病的慢性肩痛患者参加了试验。随机分配了77个肩膀。通过解剖学界标方法随机接受该阻滞的组接受了一个肩cap上神经阻滞。 CT引导组的患者注射了醋酸甲泼尼龙和肩cap上神经周围较小量的布比卡因。由“盲人”观察员随访患者12周,并在注射后第1、4和12周进行检查。 >结果:接受两种神经阻滞的肩膀的所有疼痛评分和残疾均明显改善,两种方法在任何时候的疼痛和残疾改善方面均无显着差异。疼痛和残疾评分的改善在临床和统计学上都很显着。两组均无明显不良反应发生。使用这两种方法缓解疼痛的患者满意度得分都很高。 >结论: CT引导下进行肩cap上神经阻滞的控制和标志性方法可显着延长疼痛和残障的时间,并且效果类似;两种方法都是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号