首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Vascular Diseases >Evaluation of the Outcome of Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Rupture in Patients in a Trauma and Critical Care Center
【2h】

Evaluation of the Outcome of Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Rupture in Patients in a Trauma and Critical Care Center

机译:在创伤和重症监护中心评估患者创伤性胸主动脉破裂的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: Multiple injuries may lead to traumatic thoracic aortic rupture (TTAR), which can be fatal. We evaluated the relationship between the clinical findings and outcomes of 26 patients with TTAR who were treated at our institution.Methods: A total of 26 patients (men, 21; women, 5; average age, 45.8 ± 19.6 years) with a diagnosis of TTAR received from 1999 to 2009 were studied. We categorized patients into groups based on the outcome (survival or death) and investigated the relationship between the outcome and the following factors: injury mechanism, vital signs, other combined injuries, injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score, and probability of survival (Ps).Results: Of the 26 TTAR patients, 7 underwent emergency operations, 5 underwent delayed operations, 1 received conservative treatment, and 13 suffered cardiopulmonary arrest immediately after consultation and died. Of the 13 patients who died, 11 died within 2 hours after injury because of bleeding. Two of the 7 patients who underwent emergency operations died within 1 day of consultation, whereas all those who underwent delayed operations survived. Patients who underwent TTAR repair had a relatively favorable outcome. Analysis of the relationship between the clinical data and outcome showed that a young age was significantly correlated with survival, and that the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), heart rate, respiratory rate, or occurrence of shock were not significantly related to the outcome. The abbreviated injury scale (AIS) was used to score the severity of multiple injuries, and ISS was calculated from the AIS score. ISS was significantly higher in the death group (P = 0.007). ISS did not significantly differ among body parts (P = 0.077), but ISS of the extremities was higher than those of other parts. Pelvic fractures were frequent in the death group. Our strategy, whereby the patient initially underwent pelvic external fixation followed by TTAR repair was found to be very effective. The P-values calculated by the trauma and injury severity score method were significantly higher in the survival group (both, P = 0.007).Conclusion: To treat TTAR, it is important to accurately evaluate the damage due to multiple injuries and apply an appropriate treatment strategy. Immediate repair of TTAR after bleeding due to combined injury improves the outcome. (English Translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2012; 21:5-9)
机译:目的:多发性损伤可能导致外伤性胸主动脉破裂(TTAR),可能致命。我们评估了在本机构接受治疗的26例TTAR患者的临床表现与预后之间的关系。方法:总共26例诊断为TTAR的患者(男性21例;女性5例;平均年龄45.8±19.6岁)。研究了1999年至2009年收到的TTAR。我们根据结局(生存或死亡)将患者分为几类,并研究结局与以下因素之间的关系:损伤机制,生命体征,其他合并损伤,损伤严重度评分(ISS),修订后的创伤评分和发生机率结果:在26例TTAR患者中,有7例接受了紧急手术,5例接受了延迟手术,1例接受了保守治疗,13例经咨询后立即心肺停止并死亡。在13例死亡患者中,有11例在受伤后2小时内因出血死亡。接受紧急手术的7例患者中有2例在咨询的1天内死亡,而所有接受延迟手术的患者均幸免于难。接受TTAR修复的患者有相对较好的结局。对临床数据与结局之间关系的分析表明,年轻与生存率显着相关,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS),心率,呼吸频率或休克的发生与结局无关。缩写伤害量表(AIS)用于对多处伤害的严重程度进行评分,并根据AIS评分计算ISS。死亡组的ISS显着更高(P = 0.007)。 ISS在人体各部位之间无显着差异(P = 0.077),但四肢的ISS高于其他部位。死亡组骨盆骨折多发。我们的策略非常有效,即首先对患者进行骨盆外固定,然后进行TTAR修复。通过创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法计算的P值在生存组中显着更高(均为P = 0.007)。结论:治疗TTAR,准确评估多发损伤造成的损害并采取适当的措施很重要。治疗策略。合并损伤导致出血后立即修复TTAR可改善预后。 (Jpn J Vasc Surg 2012的英文翻译; 21:5-9)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号