首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Assessment of Time to Clinical Response a Proxy for Discharge Readiness among Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Who Received either Ceftaroline Fosamil or Ceftriaxone in Two Phase III FOCUS Trials
【2h】

Assessment of Time to Clinical Response a Proxy for Discharge Readiness among Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Who Received either Ceftaroline Fosamil or Ceftriaxone in Two Phase III FOCUS Trials

机译:在两次III期FOCUS试验中接受头孢洛林福沙美或头孢曲松治疗的社区获得性肺炎住院患者的临床反应时间评估(出院准备指标)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The primary driver of health care costs for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the hospital length of stay (LOS). Unfortunately, hospital LOS comparisons are difficult to make from phase III CAP trials because of their structured designs and prespecified treatment durations. However, an opportunity still exists to draw inferences about potential LOS differences between treatments through the use of surrogates for hospital discharge. The intent of this study was to quantify the time to a clinical response, a proxy for the time to discharge readiness, among hospitalized CAP patients who received either ceftaroline or ceftriaxone in two phase III CAP FOCUS clinical trials. On the basis of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Thoracic Society CAP management guidelines and recent FDA guidance documents for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, a post hoc adjudication algorithm was constructed a priori to compare the time to a clinical response, a proxy for the time to discharge readiness, between patients who received ceftaroline or ceftriaxone. Overall, 1,116 patients (ceftaroline, n = 562; ceftriaxone, n = 554) from the pooled FOCUS trials met the selection criteria for this analysis. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that ceftaroline was associated with a shorter time, measured in days, to meeting the clinical response criteria (P = 0.03). Of the patients on ceftaroline, 61.0, 76.1, and 83.6% achieved a clinical response by days 3, 4, and 5, compared to 54.3, 69.8, and 79.3% of the ceftriaxone-treated patients. In the Cox regression, ceftaroline was associated with a shorter time to a clinical response (HR, 1.16, P = 0.02). The methodology employed here provides a framework to draw comparative effectiveness inferences from phase III CAP efficacy trials. (The FOCUS trials whose data were analyzed in this study have been registered at under registration no. and .)
机译:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的医疗保健费用的主要驱动因素是医院的住院时间(LOS)。不幸的是,由于其结构化设计和预先指定的治疗持续时间,很难从CAPⅢ期临床试验中比较医院LOS。然而,仍然存在机会通过使用代孕药物出院来推断治疗之间潜在的LOS差异。这项研究的目的是量化在两项III期CAP FOCUS临床试验中接受头孢洛林或头孢曲松治疗的住院CAP患者中的临床反应时间(即出院准备时间的代理人)。根据美国传染病学会和美国胸科学会CAP管理指南以及针对社区获得性细菌性肺炎的最新FDA指导文件,事先建立了事后裁决算法,以比较时间与临床反应,该算法是接受头孢洛林或头孢曲松治疗的患者之间的出院准备时间。总体而言,来自FOCUS汇总试验的1,116例患者(头孢洛林,n = 562;头孢曲松钠,n = 554)符合该分析的选择标准。 Kaplan-Meier分析表明,头孢洛林符合临床反应标准的时间较短(以天为单位)(P = 0.03)。在头孢洛林治疗的患者中,到第3、4和5天时,有61.0%,76.1%和83.6%的患者获得了临床缓解,相比之下,头孢曲松治疗的患者为54.3%,69.8%和79.3%。在Cox回归中,ceftaroline与较短的临床反应时间相关(HR,1.16,P = 0.02)。此处使用的方法提供了一个框架,可以从III期CAP功效试验中得出比较的功效推论。 (本研究中已分析其数据的FOCUS试验已在注册号为和下进行了注册。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号