首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >EUCAST Testing of Isavuconazole Susceptibility in Aspergillus: Comparison of Results for Inoculum Standardization Using Conidium Counting versus Optical Density
【2h】

EUCAST Testing of Isavuconazole Susceptibility in Aspergillus: Comparison of Results for Inoculum Standardization Using Conidium Counting versus Optical Density

机译:曲霉中伊沙康康唑敏感性的EUCAST测试:使用分生孢子计数与光密度的接种标样标准化结果的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The EUCAST E.DEF9.1 standard recommends standardization of the inoculum concentration by conidium counting using a hemocytometer rather than a spectrophotometer. In this study, we investigated whether the choice of these methods influenced isavuconazole MICs. A blinded collection of 30 molecularly characterized azole-resistant isolates and 10 wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus isolates was shared with four different laboratories. Additionally, each laboratory selected approximately 100 A. fumigatus isolates and 50 isolates each of A. flavus, A. nidulans, A. niger, and A. terreus (1,237 isolates in total). Three laboratories (laboratories 1 to 3) used conidium counting. One laboratory standardized the inoculum using a spectrophotometer (that is, by use of the optical density [OD]) and is referred to as the OD laboratory. Correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients, and essential agreement were calculated, and 2-log-unit differences were assessed (paired t test). The MIC range for the blinded collection was 0.25 to 16 mg/liter, and a 1-dilution-step difference between the MIC50 and MIC90 across the four laboratories was detected and a 2-dilution-step difference between the modal MICs was detected. Compared to the results for laboratories 1 and 2, a significant correlation was found for the OD laboratory MIC data (correlation coefficients, 0.85 and 0.93, respectively; intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.88 and 0.96, respectively). The number of mutant isolates whose MICs overlapped those of the wild-type isolates was the lowest for the OD laboratory (14/30 [46.7%] mutant isolates), whereas the numbers were 18/30 (60%) isolates for laboratory 1, 17/30 (56.7%) isolates for laboratory 2, and 21/30 (70%) isolates for laboratory 3. For the A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, A. niger, and A. terreus isolates, comparative analysis again defined the MIC distributions from the OD laboratory to be in excellent agreement with those from laboratories 1 and 2 across all five Aspergillus spp. The findings suggest that EUCAST testing using OD determination is an appropriate alternative for standardization of Aspergillus inoculum concentrations.
机译:EUCAST E.DEF9.1标准建议使用血细胞计数器而非分光光度计通过分生孢子计数标准化接种物浓度。在这项研究中,我们调查了这些方法的选择是否影响了艾伐康唑的MIC。与四个不同的实验室共享了30个具有分子特征的抗唑类分离株和10个野生型烟曲霉分离株的盲区。此外,每个实验室选择了大约100种烟曲霉菌株和黄曲霉,构巢曲霉,黑曲霉和土曲霉每种菌株50个菌株(总共1,237个菌株)。三个实验室(实验室1至3)使用了分生孢子计数。一个实验室使用分光光度计(即通过使用光密度[OD])对接种物进行标准化,并称为OD实验室。计算相关系数,组内相关系数和基本一致性,并评估2-log-单位差异(配对t检验)。盲收集的MIC范围为0.25至16 mg / L,并且在四个实验室中检测到MIC50和MIC90之间存在1-稀释步长差异,而模式MIC之间存在2-稀释步长差异。与实验室1和2的结果相比,OD实验室MIC数据具有显着相关性(相关系数分别为0.85和0.93;组内相关系数分别为0.88和0.96)。对于OD实验室,其MIC与野生型分离株重叠的突变株的数量最低(14/30 [46.7%]突变株),而对于实验室1,其分离株的数量为18/30(60%)。实验室2的17/30(56.7%)分离株,实验室3的21/30(70%)分离株。对于黄曲霉,烟曲霉,构巢曲霉,黑曲霉和土曲霉,比较分析再次确定,OD实验室的MIC分布与所有五个曲霉属菌种的实验室1和2的MIC分布非常一致。研究结果表明,使用OD测定进行EUCAST测试是标准化曲霉接种物浓度的合适替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号