首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Comparison of Intrapulmonary and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Colistin Methanesulfonate (CMS) and Colistin after Aerosol Delivery and Intravenous Administration of CMS in Critically Ill Patients
【2h】

Comparison of Intrapulmonary and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Colistin Methanesulfonate (CMS) and Colistin after Aerosol Delivery and Intravenous Administration of CMS in Critically Ill Patients

机译:重症患者气溶胶输送和静脉内施用CMS后Colistin甲磺酸盐(CMS)和Colistin的肺内和全身药代动力学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Colistin is an old antibiotic that has recently gained a considerable renewal of interest for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Nebulization seems to be a promising form of administration, but colistin is administered as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS); however, differences between the intrapulmonary concentrations of the active moiety as a function of the route of administration in critically ill patients have not been precisely documented. In this study, CMS and colistin concentrations were measured on two separate occasions within the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of critically ill patients (n = 12) who had received 2 million international units (MIU) of CMS by aerosol delivery and then intravenous administration. The pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a population approach and completed by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and simulations. The ELF colistin concentrations varied considerably (9.53 to 1,137 mg/liter), but they were much higher than those in plasma (0.15 to 0.73 mg/liter) after aerosol delivery but not after intravenous administration of CMS. Following CMS aerosol delivery, typically, 9% of the CMS dose reached the ELF, and only 1.4% was presystemically converted into colistin. PK-PD analysis concluded that there was much higher antimicrobial efficacy after CMS aerosol delivery than after intravenous administration. These new data seem to support the use of aerosol delivery of CMS for the treatment of pulmonary infections in critical care patients.
机译:Colistin是一种旧的抗生素,最近在治疗由​​于多重耐药的革兰氏阴性细菌引起的肺部感染方面已引起了广泛的关注。雾化似乎是一种有前途的给药方式,但是粘菌素是一种无活性的前药,粘菌素甲磺酸盐(CMS)。然而,在危重病人中肺内活性部分浓度之间的差异作为给药途径的函数尚未得到精确记录。在这项研究中,在两次分别通过气雾剂递送接受了200万国际单位(MIU)CMS的重症患者(n = 12)的血浆和上皮内衬液(ELF)中,分别测量了CMS和粘菌素浓度静脉内给药。使用群体方法进行药代动力学分析,并通过药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)建模和模拟完成。 ELF粘菌素的浓度相差很大(9.53至1,137 mg / l),但比气雾剂给药后血浆中的浓度(0.15至0.73 mg / l)要高得多,但静脉注射CMS后则没有。 CMS气雾剂递送后,通常有9%的CMS剂量达到了ELF,只有1.4%的系统性转化为粘菌素。 PK-PD分析得出的结论是,CMS气雾剂递送后的抗菌功效要比静脉内施用后高得多。这些新数据似乎支持使用CMS气雾剂递送治疗重症监护患者的肺部感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号