首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Treatment of typhoid fever with ceftriaxone for 5 days or chloramphenicol for 14 days: a randomized clinical trial.
【2h】

Treatment of typhoid fever with ceftriaxone for 5 days or chloramphenicol for 14 days: a randomized clinical trial.

机译:头孢曲松5天或氯霉素14天治疗伤寒:一项随机临床试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of ceftriaxone given once daily for 5 days and chloramphenicol given four times daily for 14 days, a controlled trial was carried out with 59 patients who were culture positive for Salmonella typhi. Ceftriaxone was given to 28 patients in once-daily intravenous doses of 75 mg/kg of body weight to children and 4 g to adults for 5 days; chloramphenicol was given to 31 patients at a dosage of 60 mg/kg/day until defervescence and then at 40 mg/kg/day to complete 14 days of treatment. All Salmonella isolates were susceptible to both antibiotics. Clinical cures (defervescence without complications, no relapse, and no need for further treatment) occurred in 79% of the patients treated with ceftriaxone and 90% of those treated with chloramphenicol (P = 0.37). On the third day of treatment, blood cultures were positive for S. typhi for 60% of the patients in the chloramphenicol group and 0% of the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.001). Defervescence occurred in half the patients in both groups during the first 7 days, but on days 9 to 13 after the start of treatment, nine patients in the ceftriaxone group, compared with six patients in the chloramphenicol group, remained febrile (P = 0.4). The median hematocrit and total leukocyte counts at day 14 were significantly lower for the chloramphenicol group than those for the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). These results indicate that the effects of therapy with ceftriaxone for typhoid fever differed from those of chloramphenicol therapy in that blood cultures became negative earlier, prolonged fever persisted in some patients, and bone marrow suppression was reduced. We conclude that a short, 5-day course of ceftriaxone is a useful alternative to conventional 14-day chloramphenicol therapy in the treatment of typhoid fever.
机译:为了比较头孢曲松每天5天和氯霉素每天4次,连续14天的治疗效果,对59例伤寒沙门氏菌呈阳性的患者进行了对照试验。头孢曲松钠以每天一次75 mg / kg体重的剂量静脉注射给28名儿童,儿童每天4 mg,成人5天;氯霉素以60 mg / kg / day的剂量给药至31名患者,直至退热,然后以40 mg / kg / day的剂量给药以完成14天的治疗。所有沙门氏菌分离株均对两种抗生素敏感。 79%的头孢曲松治疗患者和90%的氯霉素治疗患者发生了临床治愈(无并发症,无复发,无需进一步治疗)(P = 0.37)。在治疗的第三天,氯霉素组60%的患者和头孢曲松组0%的患者的血培养对伤寒沙门氏菌呈阳性(P = 0.001)。在开始的7天内,两组患者中有一半出现了神经退热,但在开始治疗后的9至13天,头孢曲松组中的9例患者保持发热,而氯霉素组中的6例仍保持发热(P = 0.4) 。氯霉素组在第14天的中位数血细胞比容和总白细胞计数显着低于头孢曲松组(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.02)。这些结果表明,头孢曲松治疗伤寒的效果与氯霉素治疗的不同之处在于,血液培养早期变得阴性,某些患者持续发烧延长,骨髓抑制降低。我们得出的结论是,在伤寒的治疗中,头孢曲松的短短5天疗程是常规14天氯霉素治疗的有用替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号