首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Analysis of Bacterial Communities in Soil by Use of Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis and Clone Libraries as Influenced by Different Reverse Primers
【2h】

Analysis of Bacterial Communities in Soil by Use of Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis and Clone Libraries as Influenced by Different Reverse Primers

机译:受不同反向引物影响的变性梯度凝胶电泳和克隆文库分析土壤中的细菌群落

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To assess soil bacterial diversity, PCR systems consisting of several slightly different reverse primers together with forward primer F968-GC were used along with subsequent denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) or clone library analyses. In this study, a set of 13 previously used and novel reverse primers was tested with the canonical forward primer as to the DGGE fingerprints obtained from grassland soil. Analysis of these DGGE profiles by GelCompar showed that they all fell into two main clusters separated by a G/A alteration at position 14 in the reverse primer used. To assess differences between the dominant bacteria amplified, we then produced four (100-membered) 16S rRNA gene clone libraries by using reverse primers with either an A or a G at position 14, designated R1401-1a, R1401-1b, R1401-2a, and R1401-2b. Subsequent sequence analysis revealed that, on the basis of the about 410-bp sequence information, all four primers amplified similar, as well as different (including novel), bacterial groups from soil. Most of the clones fell into two main phyla, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Within Firmicutes, the majority of the clones belonged to the genus Bacillus. Within Proteobacteria, the majority of the clones fell into the alpha or gamma subgroup whereas a few were delta and beta proteobacteria. The other phyla found were Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Chlorobi, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, candidate division TM7, Ferribacter, Cyanobacteria, and Deinococcus. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that reverse primers R1401-1b and R1401-1a both produced libraries with the highest diversities yet amplified different types. Their concomitant use is recommended.
机译:为了评估土壤细菌多样性,使用了由几个略有不同的反向引物和正向引物F968-GC组成的PCR系统,以及随后的变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)或克隆文库分析。在这项研究中,使用规范的正向引物对一组13种先前使用的新颖反向引物进行了测试,以了解从草地土壤中获得的DGGE指纹。通过GelCompar对这些DGGE谱图的分析表明,它们全部落入两个主要簇中,这些簇由所用反向引物中14位的G / A改变隔开。为了评估扩增的优势细菌之间的差异,我们然后通过使用在位置14处带有A或G的反向引物(称为R1401-1a,R1401-1b,R1401-2a)产生了四个(100元)16S rRNA基因克隆文库和R1401-2b。随后的序列分析表明,基于约410-bp的序列信息,所有四种引物均从土壤中扩增出相似,以及不同(包括新的)细菌群。大多数克隆都落入两个主要门系,Firmicutes和Proteobacteria。在Firmicutes中,大多数克隆属于芽孢杆菌属。在Proteobacteria中,大多数克隆属于α或γ亚组,而少数是δ和βProteobacteria。发现的其他门系是放线菌,酸性杆菌,疣状微生物,绿弯曲菌,芽孢杆菌,绿藻,拟杆菌,衣原体,候选分裂TM7,铁杆菌,蓝细菌和脱球菌。数据的统计分析表明,反向引物R1401-1b和R1401-1a均产生了多样性最高的文库,但扩增了不同类型的文库。建议同时使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号