首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria.
【2h】

Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria.

机译:两种直接计数技术对水生细菌计数的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Planktonic bacteria from an estuary were concentrated on membrane filters and counted with both a scanning electron microscope and an epi-illuminated fluorescent microscope. Counts on 0.2 micron Nuclepore filters (polycarbonate) were significantly higher (P less than 0.001) than counts on 0.2-micron Sartorius filters (cellulose). In contrast, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques when Nuclepore filters were used (0.5 less than P less than 0.9). The average cell volume from this study area was 0.047 micron3. The estimated number of bacteria ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) bacteria per ml, representing from 4 to 40 mg of C per m3.
机译:将来自河口的浮游细菌浓缩在膜滤器上,并用扫描电子显微镜和落射照明荧光显微镜计数。 0.2微米Nuclepore过滤器(聚碳酸酯)上的计数显着高于(P小于0.001)(Sartorius过滤器(纤维素)上的计数)。相反,当使用Nuclepore过滤器时,两种技术之间没有统计学上的显着差异(小于0.5小于P小于0.9)。该研究区域的平均细胞体积为0.047微米3。估计的细菌数量为每毫升10(6)至10(7)个细菌,代表每立方米4至40毫克碳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号