首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine >A critique of the WHO TobRegs Advisory Note report entitled: Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects research needs and recommended actions by regulators
【2h】

A critique of the WHO TobRegs Advisory Note report entitled: Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects research needs and recommended actions by regulators

机译:对WHO TobReg的建议说明报告的批评该报告的标题是:水烟吸烟:对健康的影响研究需求以及监管机构建议采取的行动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and aimThe World Health Organisation Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg) has issued in 2005 an "Advisory Note" entitled: "Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: Health Effects, Research Needs and Recommended Actions by Regulators". "Waterpipe" smoking is now considered a global public health threat and the corresponding artefact is actually known in the world under three main terms: hookah, narghile and shisha. This important report, the first ever prepared by WHO on the subject, poses two major problems. On one hand, its bibliographical references dismiss world chief relevant studies. On the other, it contains a certain number of errors of many orders: biomedical, sociological, anthropological and historical. The purpose of the present study is to highlight, one by one, where these weaknesses and errors lie and show how this official report can be considerably improved.
机译:背景和目的世界卫生组织烟草制品法规研究小组(TobReg)在2005年发布了一份“建议性说明”,标题为:“吸烟的水烟:对健康的影响,监管机构的研究需求和建议采取的行动”。现在,“水烟”吸烟被认为是全球公共卫生的威胁,而相应的人工制品实际上已在世界上以三个主要术语而闻名:水烟,纳吉尔和水烟。这份重要的报告是世界卫生组织有史以来就此主题编写的第一份报告,提出了两个主要问题。一方面,它的参考书目驳斥了世界主要的相关研究。另一方面,它包含许多顺序的一定数量的错误:生物医学,社会学,人类学和历史错误。本研究的目的是逐一强调这些弱点和错误所在,并说明如何可以大大改善本正式报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号