首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Australia and New Zealand Health Policy >Assessing outcomes of health and medical research: do we measure what counts or count what we can measure?
【2h】

Assessing outcomes of health and medical research: do we measure what counts or count what we can measure?

机译:评估健康和医学研究的结果:我们是否衡量或衡量我们可以衡量的?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Governments world wide are increasingly demanding outcome measures to evaluate research investment. Health and medical research outputs can be considered as gains in knowledge, wealth and health. Measurement of the impacts of research on health are difficult, particularly within the time frames of granting bodies. Thus evaluations often measure what can be measured, rather than what should be measured. Traditional academic metrics are insufficient to demonstrate societal benefit from public investment in health research. New approaches that consider all the benefits of research are needed.
机译:世界各国政府对评估研究投资的结果要求越来越高。可以将健康和医学研究成果视为知识,财富和健康方面的收获。衡量研究对健康的影响是困难的,尤其是在授权机构的时间框架内。因此,评估通常衡量的是可以衡量的,而不是应该衡量的。传统的学术指标不足以证明公共投资对健康研究产生的社会效益。需要一种考虑研究所有收益的新方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号