首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Ovarian Research >Reinterpretation of evidence advanced for neo-oogenesis in mammals in terms of a finite oocyte reserve
【2h】

Reinterpretation of evidence advanced for neo-oogenesis in mammals in terms of a finite oocyte reserve

机译:根据有限的卵母细胞储备重新解释哺乳动物新卵发生的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The central tenet of ovarian biology, that the oocyte reserve in adult female mammals is finite, has been challenged over recent years by proponents of neo-oogenesis, who claim that germline stem cells exist in the ovarian surface epithelium or the bone marrow. Currently opinion is divided over these claims, and further scrutiny of the evidence advanced in support of the neo-oogenesis hypothesis is warranted - especially in view of the enormous implications for female fertility and health. This article contributes arguments against the hypothesis, providing alternative explanations for key observations, based on published data. Specifically, DNA synthesis in germ cells in the postnatal mouse ovary is attributed to mitochondrial genome replication, and to DNA repair in oocytes lagging in meiotic progression. Lines purported to consist of germline stem cells are identified as ovarian epithelium or as oogonia, from which cultures have been derived previously. Effects of ovotoxic treatments are found to negate claims for the existence of germline stem cells. And arguments are presented for the misidentification of ovarian somatic cells as de novo oocytes. These clarifications, if correct, undermine the concept that germline stem cells supplement the oocyte quota in the postnatal ovary; and instead comply with the theory of a fixed, unregenerated reserve. It is proposed that acceptance of the neo-oogenesis hypothesis is erroneous, and may effectively impede research in areas of ovarian biology. To illustrate, a novel explanation that is consistent with orthodox theory is provided for the observed restoration of fertility in chemotherapy-treated female mice following bone marrow transplantation, otherwise interpreted by proponents of neo-oogenesis as involving stimulation of endogenous germline stem cells. Instead, it is proposed that the chemotherapeutic regimens induce autoimmunity to ovarian antigens, and that the haematopoietic chimaerism produced by bone marrow transplantation circumvents activation of an autoreactive response, thereby rescuing ovarian function. The suggested mechanism draws from animal models of autoimmune ovarian disease, which implicate dysregulation of T cell regulatory function; and from a surmised role for follicular apoptosis in the provision of ovarian autoantigens, to sustain self-tolerance during homeostasis. This interpretation has direct implications for fertility preservation in women undergoing chemotherapy.
机译:卵巢生物学的中心原则是成年雌性哺乳动物的卵母细胞储备是有限的,近年来受到新卵子发生的支持者的挑战,他们声称种系干细胞存在于卵巢表面上皮或骨髓中。目前,对这些主张的意见分歧,并且有必要进一步审查支持新卵发生假说的先进证据,尤其是考虑到对女性生育和健康的巨大影响。本文提出了反对该假设的论据,并根据已发布的数据为关键观察提供了替代解释。具体来说,产后小鼠卵巢生殖细胞中的DNA合成归因于线粒体基因组复制,而归因于减数分裂进程滞后的卵母细胞中的DNA修复。据称由种系干细胞组成的品系被鉴定为卵巢上皮或卵原细胞,先前已从中获得了培养物。发现卵毒性治疗的效果否定了种系干细胞的存在的主张。并提出了将卵巢体细胞误识别为新生卵母细胞的论点。这些澄清,如果正确,将破坏种系干细胞补充产后卵巢卵母细胞配额的观念。而是遵循固定的,未再生储备的理论。有人提出,对新卵发生假说的接受是错误的,并且可能有效地阻碍卵巢生物学领域的研究。为了说明,提供了与正统理论一致的新颖解释,用于观察骨髓移植后经化学疗法处理的雌性小鼠中观察到的生育力恢复,否则,新卵新生细胞的支持者将其解释为涉及内源种系干细胞的刺激。相反,建议化疗方案诱导对卵巢抗原的自身免疫,并且由骨髓移植产生的造血嵌合体绕过自身反应性反应的激活,从而抢救卵巢功能。提示的机制来自自身免疫性卵巢疾病的动物模型,这暗示着T细胞调节功能的异常。推测是卵泡凋亡在卵巢自身抗原的提供中起着维持稳态过程中自我耐受的作用。这种解释对接受化疗的妇女的生育能力具有直接影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号