首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Ophthalmology >Retro-Mode Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Planning for Navigated Macular Laser Photocoagulation in Macular Edema
【2h】

Retro-Mode Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Planning for Navigated Macular Laser Photocoagulation in Macular Edema

机译:复古式扫描激光检眼镜规划黄斑水肿的导航黄斑激光光凝。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To compare treatment areas and navigated macular laser photocoagulation (MLP) plans suggested by retro-mode scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (RM-SLO) image versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) central retinal thickness map and treatment planning among retina specialists. Methods. Thirty-nine eyes with diabetic or branch retinal vein occlusion-related ME undergoing navigated MLP with navigated photocoagulator had OCT and RM-SLO taken. OCT map and RM-SLO image were imported to the photocoagulator and aligned onto the retina. Two retina specialists placed laser spot marks separately based on OCT and RM-SLO images in a random fashion. The spots placed by each physician were compared between OCT and RM-SLO and among physicians. The areas of retinal edema on OCT and RM-SLO of the same eye were also compared. Results. The average number of laser spots using RM-SLO and OCT template was 189.6 ± 77.4 and 136.6 ± 46.8, respectively, P = 0.003. The average area of edema on RM-SLO image was larger than that on OCT map (14.5 ± 3.9 mm2 versus 10.3 ± 2.8 mm2, P = 0.005) because of a larger scanning area. There was narrow variability in treatment planning among retina specialists for both RM-SLO (P = 0.13) and OCT (P = 0.19). Conclusion. The RM-SLO image superimposed onto the fundus of the same eye can be used to guide MLP with narrow variability in treatment planning among retina specialists. The treatment areas suggested by RM-SLO-guided MLP plans for ME were shown to be larger than those suggested by OCT-guided plans.
机译:目的。为了比较视网膜扫描专家在视网膜模式专家的眼底厚度图和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与视网膜专家之间的治疗计划和导航黄斑区激光黄斑凝固术(MLP)计划之间的比较,建议采用复古模式扫描激光检眼镜(RM-SLO)图像。方法。三十九只患有糖尿病或视网膜静脉分支闭塞相关性ME的患者接受了导航的MLP和导航光凝器的OCT和RM-SLO检查。将OCT图和RM-SLO图像导入光凝器,并对准视网膜。两名视网膜专家根据OCT和RM-SLO图像分别随机放置了激光斑点。在OCT和RM-SLO之间以及在医师之间比较了每个医师放置的斑点。还比较了同一只眼的OCT和RM-SLO上的视网膜水肿区域。结果。使用RM-SLO和OCT模板的平均激光点数分别为189.6±77.4和136.6±46.8,P = 0.003。由于以下原因,RM-SLO图像上的平均水肿面积大于OCT图上的平均水肿面积(14.5±3.9 mm 2 对10.3±2.8 mm 2 ,P = 0.005)。较大的扫描区域。视网膜专科医生对RM-SLO(P = 0.13)和OCT(P = 0.19)的治疗计划差异较小。结论。叠加在同一只眼底上的RM-SLO图像可用于指导MLP,视网膜专家之间的治疗计划差异很小。经RM-SLO指导的MLP计划建议的ME治疗范围要比OCT指导的计划建议的治疗范围更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号