首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
【2h】

Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements in Healthy Subjects Using Fourier and Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

机译:使用傅里叶和时域光学相干层析成像技术对健康受试者的视网膜神经纤维层厚度进行测量的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements using two different ocular coherence tomography (OCT) devices: Cirrus Fourier domain OCT and Stratus time domain OCT. To analyze reproducibility of Fourier domain measurements in healthy subjects. Methods. One hundred and thirty-two eyes of 132 healthy subjects were scaned on the same day with both instruments, separated by 10 minutes from each other. Thickness of quadrant, average and the 12 different areas around the optic nerve were compared between Cirrus and Stratus. Repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and coefficients of variation (COVs) were calculated in RNFL measurements provided by Fourier domain device. Results. The average thickness in the optic cube was 95.50 μm using Cirrus and 97.85 μm using Stratus. Average thickness and temporal quadrant showed significant differences using Cirrus and Stratus methods. Reproducibility was better with Fourier domain OCT (mean COV of 4.54%) than with Stratus time-domain OCT (mean COV of 5.57%). Conclusions. Both scan options give reproducible RNFL thickness measurement, but there are differences between them. Measurements obtained using Fourier domain device show better reproducibility.
机译:目的。为了比较使用两种不同的眼相干断层扫描(OCT)设备进行的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)测量:Cirrus Fourier域OCT和Stratus时域OCT。在健康受试者中分析傅立叶域测量值的可重复性。方法。当天用两种仪器扫描了132名健康受试者的132只眼睛,彼此间隔10分钟。比较了Cirrus和Stratus的象限,平均厚度以及视神经周围的12个不​​同区域的厚度。在傅立叶域设备提供的RNFL测量中计算了重复性,组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(COV)。结果。使用Cirrus的光学立方体的平均厚度为95.50μm,使用Stratus的平均厚度为97.85μm。使用Cirrus和Stratus方法,平均厚度和颞象限显示出显着差异。傅立叶域OCT(平均COV为4.54%)比Stratus时域OCT(平均COV为5.57%)更好。结论。两种扫描选项均可提供可重现的RNFL厚度测量,但它们之间存在差异。使用傅里叶域设备获得的测量结果显示出更好的重现性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号