首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Behavioural Neurology >Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Event-Related Brain Potentials Show Similar Mechansims of Frontal Inhibition but Dissimilar Target Evaluation Processes
【2h】

Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Event-Related Brain Potentials Show Similar Mechansims of Frontal Inhibition but Dissimilar Target Evaluation Processes

机译:抽动秽语综合征和强迫症:事件相关的脑电势显示相似的额叶抑制机制但目标评估过程不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: Tourette Syndrome (TS) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders (OCD) share many clinical similarities and show a strong comorbidity. Current theories view a frontal-striatal dysfunction as the underlying cause of many clinical aspects of both disorders.This study sought to investigate mechanisms of conceptual integration and attention in both disorders. We hypothesized that the processing of stimuli with interfering aspects would be altered in a similar way while attentional mechanisms could differ. Methods: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded in a modified STROOP-paradigm in groups of TS and OCD patients and in a control group. The paradigm involved the presentation of color words in a range of different colors. The subjects had to respond to words of matching word content and color and to ignore mismatching stimuli. Results: Incongruent stimuli elicited a frontal negative component (“N450”) which was enhanced in amplitude and prolonged in latency in both patient groups. Matching stimuli evoked enhanced N2 and P3b components representing target evaluation mechanisms. The OCD group alone displayed a larger P3b amplitude in comparison to both other groups. Conclusions: The data are interpreted to indicate that frontal inhibitory mechanisms are altered alike in TS and OCD. In contrast, only the OCD group showed evidence for aberrant target evaluation.
机译:目的:图雷氏综合症(TS)和强迫症(OCD)具有许多临床相似之处,并显示出很强的合并症。目前的理论认为额叶纹状体功能障碍是这两种疾病的许多临床方面的根本原因。本研究旨在探讨两种疾病的概念整合和注意的机制。我们假设,在具有不同注意机制的情况下,具有干扰方面的刺激处理将以类似的方式发生变化。方法:在改良的STROOP范例中,在TS和OCD患者组以及对照组中记录与事件相关的脑电势(ERP)。该范例涉及各种不同颜色的颜色词的表示。受试者必须对与单词内容和颜色相匹配的单词做出反应,并忽略不匹配的刺激。结果:不一致的刺激引起额叶阴性成分(“ N450”),这两个患者组的振幅均增加,潜伏期延长。匹配刺激诱发了代表目标评估机制的增强的N2和P3b成分。与其他两组相比,单独的OCD组显示出更大的P3b幅度。结论:数据被解释为表明额叶抑制和TSD中的额叶抑制机制也发生了改变。相比之下,只有OCD组显示出异常目标评估的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号