首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biophysical Journal >Quantitative Comparison of Different Fluorescent Protein Couples for Fast FRET-FLIM Acquisition
【2h】

Quantitative Comparison of Different Fluorescent Protein Couples for Fast FRET-FLIM Acquisition

机译:快速FRET-FLIM采集中不同荧光蛋白对的定量比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The fluorescent-protein based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) approach is a powerful method for quantifying protein-protein interactions in living cells, especially when combined with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). To compare the performance of different FRET couples for FRET-FLIM experiments, we first tested enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) linked to different red acceptors (mRFP1-EGFP, mStrawberry-EGFP, HaloTag (TMR)-EGFP, and mCherry-EGFP). We obtained a fraction of donor engaged in FRET (fD) that was far from the ideal case of one, using different mathematical models assuming a double species model (i.e., discrete double exponential fixing the donor lifetime and double exponential stretched for the FRET lifetime). We show that the relatively low fD percentages obtained with these models may be due to spectroscopic heterogeneity of the acceptor population, which is partially caused by different maturation rates for the donor and the acceptor. In an attempt to improve the amount of donor protein engaged in FRET, we tested mTFP1 as a donor coupled to mOrange and EYFP, respectively. mTFP1 turned out to be at least as good as EGFP for donor FRET-FLIM experiments because 1), its lifetime remained constant during light-induced fluorescent changes; 2), its fluorescence decay profile was best fitted with a single exponential model; and 3), no photoconversion was detected. The fD value when combined with EYFP as an acceptor was the highest of all tandems tested (0.7). Moreover, in the context of fast acquisitions, we obtained a minimal fD (mfD) for mTFP1-EYFP that was almost two times greater than that for mCherry-EGFP (0.65 vs. 0.35). Finally, we compared EGFP and mTFP1 in a biological situation in which the fusion proteins were highly immobile, and EGFP and mTFP1 were linked to the histone H4 (EGFP-H4 and mTFP1-H4) in fast FLIM acquisitions. In this particular case, the fluorescence intensity was more stable for EGFP-H4 than for mTFP1-H4. Nevertheless, we show that mTFP1/EYFP stands alone as the best FRET-FLIM couple in terms of fD analysis.
机译:基于荧光蛋白质的荧光共振能量转移(FRET)方法是定量活细胞中蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的强大方法,尤其是与荧光寿命成像显微镜(FLIM)结合使用时。为了比较FRET-FLIM实验中不同FRET对的性能,我们首先测试了与不同红色受体(mRFP1-EGFP,mStrawberry-EGFP,HaloTag(TMR)-EGFP和mCherry-EGFP)连接的增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)。 。我们使用假设双物种模型的不同数学模型,获得了参与FRET(fD)的供体,与理想情况相去甚远(即,离散双指数固定了供体寿命,而双指数拉伸了FRET寿命) 。我们表明,用这些模型获得的相对较低的fD百分比可能是由于受体群体的光谱异质性,部分原因是供体和受体的成熟度不同。为了提高参与FRET的供体蛋白的量,我们测试了mTFP1作为分别与mOrange和EYFP偶联的供体。事实证明,对于供体FRET-FLIM实验,mTFP1至少与EGFP一样好,因为1)其寿命在光诱导的荧光变化期间保持恒定; 2),其荧光衰减曲线最适合单指数模型; 3)未检测到光转换。当与EYFP结合使用时,fD值是所有测试的双稳态中最高的(0.7)。此外,在快速获取的情况下,我们获得了mTFP1-EYFP的最小fD(mfD),几乎是mCherry-EGFP的fD(0.65 vs. 0.35)。最后,我们在融合蛋白高度不固定的生物学情况下比较了EGFP和mTFP1,并且在快速FLIM采集中EGFP和mTFP1与组蛋白H4(EGFP-H4和mTFP1-H4)相连。在此特定情况下,EGFP-H4的荧光强度比mTFP1-H4的荧光强度更稳定。然而,从fD分析的角度来看,我们证明mTFP1 / EYFP是最好的FRET-FLIM对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号