首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Blood Advances >Risk-adapted survival benefit of IMRT in early-stage NKTCL: a multicenter study from the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group
【2h】

Risk-adapted survival benefit of IMRT in early-stage NKTCL: a multicenter study from the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group

机译:IMRT在早期NKTCL中适应风险的生存获益:来自中国淋巴瘤合作组织的多中心研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study evaluated the survival benefit of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared with 3-dimension conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in a large national cohort of patients with early-stage extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL). This retrospective study reviewed patients with early-stage NKTCL treated with high-dose radiation therapy (RT; ≥45 Gy) at 16 Chinese institutions. Patients were stratified into 1 of 4 risk groups based on the number of risk factors: low risk (no factors), intermediate-low risk (1 factor), intermediate-high risk (2 factors), and high-risk (3-5 factors). Of the 1691 patients, 981 (58%) received IMRT, and 710 (42%) received 3D-CRT. Unadjusted 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 75.9% and 67.6%, respectively, for IMRT compared with 68.9% (P = .004) and 58.2% (P < .001), respectively, for 3D-CRT. After propensity score match and multivariable analyses to account for confounding factors, IMRT remained significantly associated with improved OS and PFS. The OS and PFS benefits of IMRT persisted in patients treated with modern chemotherapy regimens. Compared with 3D-CRT, IMRT significantly improved OS and PFS for high-risk and intermediate-high–risk patients but provided limited benefits for low-risk or intermediate-low–risk patients. A risk-adapted survival benefit profile of IMRT can be used to select patients and make treatment decisions.
机译:这项研究评估了在全国一大批早期结外鼻腔型自然杀手/ T细胞淋巴瘤患者中,调强放射治疗(IMRT)与3维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)相比的生存获益。 (NKTCL)。这项回顾性研究回顾了中国16家机构接受大剂量放射治疗(RT;≥45Gy)的早期NKTCL患者。根据风险因素的数量将患者分为4个风险组中的1个:低风险(无因素),中低风险(1个因素),中高风险(2个因素)和高风险(3-5个)因素)。在1691例患者中,有981例(58%)接受了IMRT,710例(42%)接受了3D-CRT。 IMRT的未经调整的5年总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为75.9%和67.6%,相比之下,IMRT为68.9%(P = .004)和58.2%(P <.001),用于3D-CRT。在倾向得分匹配和多变量分析以解决混杂因素后,IMRT仍与改善的OS和PFS显着相关。 IMRT的OS和PFS益处在接受现代化疗方案治疗的患者中持续存在。与3D-CRT相比,IMRT显着改善了高危和中高危患者的OS和PFS,但对低危或中低危患者的益处有限。 IMRT的风险适应性生存获益概况可用于选择患者并制定治疗决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号