首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Cancer >Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO GBG EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel
【2h】

Prospective evaluation of prognostic factors uPA/PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer: Phase III NNBC3-Europe trial (AGO GBG EORTC-PBG) comparing 6 × FEC versus 3 × FEC/3 × Docetaxel

机译:uPA / PAI-1对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌预后因素的前瞻性评估:NNBC3-Europe III期临床试验(AGOGBGEORTC-PBG)比较了6×FEC与3×FEC / 3×多西紫杉醇

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundToday, more than 70% of patients with primary node-negative breast cancer are cured by local therapy alone. Many patients receive overtreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy due to inadequate risk assessment. So far, few clinical trials have prospectively evaluated tumor biology based prognostic factors. Risk assessment by a biological algorithm including invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) will assess up to 35-55% of node-negative patients as low-risk and thus avoid chemotherapy. In contrast, a clinical-pathological algorithm will only classify 20-40% of patients as low-risk. High-risk node-negative patients should receive chemotherapy. Anthracycline-based regimens are accepted as a standard, the additional benefit of taxanes remains an open question.
机译:背景技术如今,仅通过局部治疗即可治愈70%以上的原发淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者。由于风险评估不足,许多患者接受了辅助化疗的过度治疗。迄今为止,很少有临床试验能够对基于肿瘤生物学的预后因素进行前瞻性评估。通过包括入侵因子尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物(uPA)及其抑制剂纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1型(PAI-1)在内的生物学算法进行风险评估,可以将多达35-55%的淋巴结阴性患者评估为低风险,因此避免化学疗法。相反,临床病理算法只能将20-40%的患者归为低危患者。高危淋巴结阴性的患者应接受化疗。以蒽环类为基础的治疗方案已被接受为标准,紫杉烷类药物的其他益处仍然是一个未解决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号