首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Pharmacy Technology : jPT : Official Publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians >A More Accurate Method to Estimate Aminoglycoside Clearance FromSerum Creatinine in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
【2h】

A More Accurate Method to Estimate Aminoglycoside Clearance FromSerum Creatinine in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

机译:从中估算氨基糖苷清除率的更准确方法脊髓损伤患者的血清肌酐水平

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Current literature reports that the traditional methods overestimate renal function in spinal cord injury (SCI); however, there is no accepted standard method. >Objective: This study evaluated 6 published methods against measured aminoglycoside (AG) drug clearance and determined the frequency with which each method would achieve target peak and trough AG concentrations within a specified range. >Methods: A chart-based investigation was conducted at a hospital with a large SCI population, and a total of 35 patients met the inclusion criteria: a diagnosis of long-standing SCI, administration of AG via intravenous infusion, and at least one set of steady-state AG peak and trough concentrations. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to compare the measured AG clearance values against the values resulting from 6 methods of estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters were used to simulate steady-state peak and trough AG concentrations from doses derived from each method. >Results: Compared with the other methods, the Lee–Dang method was found to be more accurate, with the smallest magnitude of variance from the measured AG clearance values. Five alternative methods significantlyoverestimated AG clearance, by approximately 70% to 160% (P< .05). The Lee–Dang method underestimated AG clearance (by 10%), however notto a significant degree (P = .079). Compared with thealternative methods, the Lee–Dang method resulted in a higher frequency ofsteady-state peak and trough AG concentrations within the target rangespecified. >Conclusion: The Lee–Dang equation for predicting GFR wasmore accurate relative to the other methods in the study population of patientswith long-term SCI.
机译:>背景:目前的文献报道,传统方法高估了脊髓损伤(SCI)中的肾功能。但是,没有公认的标准方法。 >目的:该研究针对测得的氨基糖苷(AG)药物清除率评估了6种公开的方法,并确定了每种方法在指定范围内达到目标峰值和谷值AG浓度的频率。 >方法:在拥有大量SCI人群的医院中进行了基于图表的调查,共有35例患者符合纳入标准:诊断为SCI长期存在,通过静脉输注进行AG ,以及至少一组稳态AG峰和谷浓度。进行药代动力学分析,以比较测得的AG清除率值与6种估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)的方法得出的值。使用患者特定的药代动力学参数,根据每种方法的剂量模拟稳态峰值和谷值AG浓度。 >结果:与其他方法相比,Lee-Dang方法被发现更加准确,与实测AG清除值的差异最小。五种替代方法AG清除率高估了大约70%至160%(P<.05)。 Lee-Dang方法低估了AG清除率(降低了10%),但并非如此(P = .079)。与之相比Lee-Dang方法的替代方法导致较高的频率稳态峰值和谷值AG浓度在目标范围内指定。 >结论:用于预测GFR的Lee-Dang方程为相对于其他方法在患者研究人群中更准确长期SCI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号