首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Evolutionary Biology >What are the consequences of combining nuclear and mitochondrial data for phylogenetic analysis? Lessons from Plethodon salamanders and 13 other vertebrate clades
【2h】

What are the consequences of combining nuclear and mitochondrial data for phylogenetic analysis? Lessons from Plethodon salamanders and 13 other vertebrate clades

机译:结合核数据和线粒体数据进行系统发育分析的后果是什么? Plethodon am和其他13个脊椎动物进化枝的教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe use of mitochondrial DNA data in phylogenetics is controversial, yet studies that combine mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data (mtDNA and nucDNA) to estimate phylogeny are common, especially in vertebrates. Surprisingly, the consequences of combining these data types are largely unexplored, and many fundamental questions remain unaddressed in the literature. For example, how much do trees from mtDNA and nucDNA differ? How are topological conflicts between these data types typically resolved in the combined-data tree? What determines whether a node will be resolved in favor of mtDNA or nucDNA, and are there any generalities that can be made regarding resolution of mtDNA-nucDNA conflicts in combined-data trees? Here, we address these and related questions using new and published nucDNA and mtDNA data for Plethodon salamanders and published data from 13 other vertebrate clades (including fish, frogs, lizards, birds, turtles, and mammals).
机译:背景技术线粒体DNA数据在系统发育学中的应用是有争议的,但是结合线粒体和核DNA数据(mtDNA和nucDNA)来估计系统发育的研究很普遍,尤其是在脊椎动物中。令人惊讶的是,结合使用这些数据类型的后果在很大程度上尚未得到探索,许多基本问题在文献中仍未解决。例如,来自mtDNA和nucDNA的树有多少不同?这些数据类型之间的拓扑冲突通常如何在组合数据树中解决?是什么决定了要解决的问题是支持mtDNA还是nucDNA,关于组合数据树中mtDNA-nucDNA冲突的解决方法,是否有任何一般性?在这里,我们使用新的和已发布的P鱼let的nucDNA和mtDNA数据,以及来自其他13个脊椎动物进化枝(包括鱼,青蛙,蜥蜴,鸟类,乌龟和哺乳动物)的数据,来解决这些问题和相关问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号