首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Genomics >Estimation of the true evolutionary distance under the fragile breakage model
【2h】

Estimation of the true evolutionary distance under the fragile breakage model

机译:易碎破损模型下真实进化距离的估计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe ability to estimate the evolutionary distance between extant genomes plays a crucial role in many phylogenomic studies. Often such estimation is based on the parsimony assumption, implying that the distance between two genomes can be estimated as the rearrangement distance equal the minimal number of genome rearrangements required to transform one genome into the other. However, in reality the parsimony assumption may not always hold, emphasizing the need for estimation that does not rely on the rearrangement distance. The distance that accounts for the actual (rather than minimal) number of rearrangements between two genomes is often referred to as the true evolutionary distance. While there exists a method for the true evolutionary distance estimation, it however assumes that genomes can be broken by rearrangements equally likely at any position in the course of evolution. This assumption, known as the random breakage model, has recently been refuted in favor of the more rigorous fragile breakage model postulating that only certain “fragile” genomic regions are prone to rearrangements.
机译:背景技术估计现存基因组之间进化距离的能力在许多系统生物学研究中起着至关重要的作用。通常,这种估计是基于简约假设,这意味着可以估计两个基因组之间的距离,因为重排距离等于将一个基因组转化为另一个基因组所需的最小基因组重排次数。但是,实际上,简约假设可能并不总是成立,从而强调了不依赖于重排距离的估计需求。占两个基因组之间实际(而非最小)重排数量的距离通常称为真实进化距离。尽管存在一种用于真实进化距离估计的方法,但是它假设基因组可以在进化过程中的任何位置被重排而断裂的可能性相同。这种被称为随机断裂模型的假设最近遭到驳斥,转而支持更为严格的脆弱断裂模型,该模型假定只有某些“脆弱”基因组区域易于重排。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号