首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions
【2h】

Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions

机译:诊断试验中的研究浪费:方法评估评估测试治疗干预措施的报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe most rigorous method for evaluating the effectiveness of diagnostic tests is through randomised trials that compare test-treatment interventions: complex interventions comprising episodes of testing, decision-making and treatment. The multi-staged nature of these interventions, combined with the need to relay diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning, has led researchers to hypothesise that test-treatment strategies may be very challenging to document. However, no reviews have yet examined the reporting quality of interventions used in test-treatment RCTs. In this study we evaluate the completeness of intervention descriptions in a systematically identified cohort of test-treatment RCTs.
机译:背景技术评估诊断测试有效性最严格的方法是通过比较测试治疗干预措施的随机试验:复杂的干预措施,包括测试,决策和治疗。这些干预措施的多阶段性质,再加上需要进行诊断性决策和治疗计划的结合,已导致研究人员假设测试治疗策略难以证明。但是,尚无任何评论检查试验治疗RCT中使用的干预措施的报告质量。在这项研究中,我们在系统确定的试验治疗RCT队列中评估干预描述的完整性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号